These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10490745)

  • 21. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital radiography: update for oral health care workers.
    Noffke CE; Nzima N; Chabikuli NJ
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):293-5. PubMed ID: 15537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dependency of dose response of five charge-coupled device-based digital intra-oral radiographic systems on tube voltage.
    Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Nov; 28(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 10578191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sci-Sat AM(1): Imaging-07: Open field normalization: How to avoid inflation to MTF and DQE values caused by zero-frequency normalization.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part3):3415. PubMed ID: 28512872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry.
    Brennan J
    J Orthod; 2002 Mar; 29(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 11907314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques.
    Cunningham IA; Reid BK
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1037-44. PubMed ID: 1518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a radiographic screen-film combination.
    Bunch PC; Huff KE; Van Metter R
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1987 May; 4(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 3598743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technical Performance of Universal and Enhanced Intraoral Imaging Rectangular Collimators.
    Johnson KB; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Aug; 89(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 26304948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 10455386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Giger ML; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 6738452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast.
    Giger ML; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 4000077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of pixel size on detectability of low-contrast signals in digital radiography.
    Giger ML; Doi K
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1987 May; 4(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 3598748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A simple model combining quantum noise and anatomical variation in radiographs.
    Ruttimann UE; Webber RL
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 6700553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An electronic survey of opinions on the compatibility of current X-ray generators with intra-oral digital X-ray systems.
    Hayakawa Y; Kuroyanagi K; Chen SK; Farman AG; Welander U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Nov; 28(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 10578187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.