204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10491040)
1. The histologic evaluation of pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing versus phenol chemical peels in vivo.
Moy LS; Kotler R; Lesser T
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Aug; 25(8):597-600. PubMed ID: 10491040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histological and clinical evaluation of facial resurfacing using a carbon dioxide laser with the computer pattern generator.
Rubach BW; Schoenrock LD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 123(9):929-34. PubMed ID: 9305242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic effects of the high-energy pulsed CO2 laser on photoaged facial skin.
Stuzin JM; Baker TJ; Baker TM; Kligman AM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jun; 99(7):2036-50; discussion 2051-5. PubMed ID: 9180729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dermabrasion, chemabrasion, and laserabrasion. Historical perspectives, modern dermabrasion techniques, and future trends.
Fulton JE
Dermatol Surg; 1996 Jul; 22(7):619-28. PubMed ID: 8680784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the laser and phenol chemical peel in facial skin resurfacing.
Langsdon PR; Milburn M; Yarber R
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Oct; 126(10):1195-9. PubMed ID: 11031405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A peeler's thoughts on skin improvement with chemical peels and laser resurfacing.
Rubin MG
Clin Plast Surg; 1997 Apr; 24(2):407-9. PubMed ID: 9142476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of periorbital wrinkles. A comparison of the SilkTouch carbon dioxide laser with a medium-depth chemical peel.
Reed JT; Joseph AK; Bridenstine JB
Dermatol Surg; 1997 Aug; 23(8):643-8. PubMed ID: 9256910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histologic evaluation of preauricular and postauricular human skin after high-energy, short-pulse carbon dioxide laser.
Cotton J; Hood AF; Gonin R; Beesen WH; Hanke CW
Arch Dermatol; 1996 Apr; 132(4):425-8. PubMed ID: 8629846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo model of histologic changes after treatment with the superpulsed CO(2) laser, erbium:YAG laser, and blended lasers: a 4- to 6-month prospective histologic and clinical study.
Greene D; Egbert BM; Utley DS; Koch RJ
Lasers Surg Med; 2000; 27(4):362-72. PubMed ID: 11074514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there still a place for deep chemical peels in the treatment of perioral wrinkles?
Costa IMC; Peres AS; Costa MC; Figueira RBFDC
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Oct; 19(10):2634-2636. PubMed ID: 32009297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Erbium:YAG laser resurfacing of the hands, arms, and neck.
Jimenez G; Spencer JM
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Nov; 25(11):831-4; discussion 834-5. PubMed ID: 10594593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of upper lip wrinkles: a comparison of 950 microsec dwell time carbon dioxide laser with unoccluded Baker's phenol chemical peel.
Chew J; Gin I; Rau KA; Amos DB; Bridenstine JB
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Apr; 25(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 10417578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser, trichloroacetic acid, Baker-Gordon phenol, and dermabrasion: a comparative clinical and histologic study of cutaneous resurfacing in a porcine model.
Fitzpatrick RE; Tope WD; Goldman MP; Satur NM
Arch Dermatol; 1996 Apr; 132(4):469-71. PubMed ID: 8629856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemical Peels: Deep, Medium, and Light.
Starkman SJ; Mangat DS
Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 35(3):239-247. PubMed ID: 31189196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prolonged erythema after facial laser resurfacing or phenol peel secondary to corticosteroid addiction.
Rapaport MJ; Rapaport V
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Oct; 25(10):781-4; discussion 785. PubMed ID: 10594579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of carbon dioxide laser, erbium:YAG laser, dermabrasion, and dermatome: a study of thermal damage, wound contraction, and wound healing in a live pig model: implications for skin resurfacing.
Ross EV; Naseef GS; McKinlay JR; Barnette DJ; Skrobal M; Grevelink J; Anderson RR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Jan; 42(1 Pt 1):92-105. PubMed ID: 10607327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dermabrasion using CO2 dry ice.
Fulton JE; Rahimi AD
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Jul; 25(7):544-8. PubMed ID: 10469111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chemical peels: their place within the range of resurfacing techniques.
Fulton JE; Porumb S
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2004; 5(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 15186197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study of dermabrasion and chemical peels in an animal model.
Stegman SJ
J Dermatol Surg Oncol; 1980 Jun; 6(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 7391325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications of resurfacing.
Ragland HP; McBurney E
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 1996 Sep; 15(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 8948539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
