These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing. Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing. Lalonde K; McCreery RW Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integration efficiency for speech perception within and across sensory modalities by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. Grant KW; Tufts JB; Greenberg S J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1164-76. PubMed ID: 17348537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults. Krull V; Humes LE Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The recognition of isolated words and words in sentences: individual variability in the use of sentence context. Grant KW; Seitz PF J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):1000-11. PubMed ID: 10687709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario. Woods WS; Kalluri S; Pentony S; Nooraei N J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4268-78. PubMed ID: 23742377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners. Phatak SA; Grant KW J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. Grant KW; Seitz PF J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction. Wu YH; Bentler RA Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests. Wu YH; Bentler RA Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition. Fabry DA; Van Tasell DJ J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 3724111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Older persons' performance on auditory, visual, and auditory-visual presentations of the Edgerton and Danhauer Nonsense Syllable Test. Danhauer JL; Garnett CM; Edgerton BJ Ear Hear; 1985; 6(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 4043572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]