These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Vibrotactile Stimulation Based on the Fundamental Frequency Can Improve Melodic Contour Identification of Normal-Hearing Listeners With a 4-Channel Cochlear Implant Simulation. Luo X; Hayes L Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1145. PubMed ID: 31736688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Identification of intonation contours by normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired listeners. Grant KW J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1172-8. PubMed ID: 3680776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing. Marx M; James C; Foxton J; Capber A; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 25303861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid. Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Urbano RC; Pero PJ J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 2739385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The verbotonal method for management of young, hearing-impaired children. Asp CW Ear Hear; 1985; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 3972193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Speechreading enhancement: a comparison of spatial-tactile display of voice fundamental frequency (F0) with auditory F0. Kishon-Rabin L; Boothroyd A; Hanin L J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):593-602. PubMed ID: 8675850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perception of frequency contours via temporal and spatial tactile transforms. Hnath-Chisolm T; Medwetsky L Ear Hear; 1988 Dec; 9(6):322-8. PubMed ID: 3220184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of speech intonation production and perception abilities of Farsi speaking cochlear implanted and normal hearing children. Moein N; Khoddami SM; Shahbodaghi MR Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():1-6. PubMed ID: 28964276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of two multichannel tactile aids for the hearing impaired. Weisenberger JM; Broadstone SM; Saunders FA J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Nov; 86(5):1764-75. PubMed ID: 2808925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. Straatman LV; Rietveld AC; Beijen J; Mylanus EA; Mens LH J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1884-95. PubMed ID: 20968360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf. Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Speechreading supplemented by single-channel and multichannel tactile displays of voice fundamental frequency. Waldstein RS; Boothroyd A J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Jun; 38(3):690-705. PubMed ID: 7674660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Coding of acoustic features for a single-channel tactile aid. Summers IR; Milnes P; Stevens JC; Cooper PG Br J Audiol; 1996 Aug; 30(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 8879689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]