These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10491710)

  • 21. Improved Sensitivity of Ultrasound-Based Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation Using Monodisperse Microbubbles.
    van Hoeve W; de Vargas Serrano M; Te Winkel L; Forsberg F; Dave JK; Sarkar K; Wessner CE; Eisenbrey JR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1781-1789. PubMed ID: 34724241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determination of the interfacial rheological properties of a poly(DL-lactic acid)-encapsulated contrast agent using in vitro attenuation and scattering.
    Paul S; Russakow D; Rodgers T; Sarkar K; Cochran M; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1277-91. PubMed ID: 23643050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhancement of subharmonic emission from encapsulated microbubbles by using a chirp excitation technique.
    Zhang D; Gong Y; Gong X; Liu Z; Tan K; Zheng H
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5531-44. PubMed ID: 17804880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions.
    Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Leodore LM; Eisenbrey JR; Park S; Hall AL; Thomenius K; Forsberg F
    Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Jul; 33(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 21842580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies.
    Cheung K; Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1209-23. PubMed ID: 18296758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
    Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shell waves and acoustic scattering from ultrasound contrast agents.
    Allen JS; Kruse DE; Ferrara KW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Mar; 48(2):409-18. PubMed ID: 11370354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ambient Pressure Sensitivity of the Subharmonic Response of Coated Microbubbles: Effects of Acoustic Excitation Parameters.
    Azami RH; Forsberg F; Eisenbrey JR; Sarkar K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1550-1560. PubMed ID: 37100673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas body activation and inertial cavitation.
    Miller DL
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2007; 93(1-3):314-30. PubMed ID: 16989895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effect of Mixing Iodinated Contrast Media and Ultrasound Contrast Agents on Subharmonic Signals.
    Esposito C; Tzan K; Machado P; Forsberg F; Dave JK
    Ultrason Imaging; 2024 Mar; 46(2):130-134. PubMed ID: 38318708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spectral normalization for ultrasonic contrast microbubble detection.
    Chen S; McMahon EM; Fatemi M; Greenleaf JF; Belohlavek M
    Ultrason Imaging; 2004 Jul; 26(3):150-62. PubMed ID: 15754796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents.
    Chatterjee D; Sarkar K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 29(12):1749-57. PubMed ID: 14698342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.
    Shekhar H; Rychak JJ; Doyley MM
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082903. PubMed ID: 23927358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents.
    Forsberg F; Shi WT; Goldberg BB
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):93-8. PubMed ID: 10829636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Resonance behaviors of encapsulated microbubbles oscillating nonlinearly with ultrasonic excitation.
    Qin D; Lei S; Wang X; Zhong X; Ji X; Li Z
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2023 Mar; 94():106334. PubMed ID: 36805411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering.
    Qin S; Caskey CF; Ferrara KW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):R27-57. PubMed ID: 19229096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Review of Phospholipid Encapsulated Ultrasound Contrast Agent Microbubble Physics.
    Helfield B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):282-300. PubMed ID: 30413335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inertial cavitation threshold of nested microbubbles.
    Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():67-74. PubMed ID: 25620709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transient subharmonic and ultraharmonic acoustic emission during dissolution of free gas bubbles.
    Biagi E; Breschi L; Masotti L
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1048-54. PubMed ID: 16118987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fundamental study on subharmonic imaging by irradiation of amplitude-modulated ultrasound waves.
    Maikusa N; Fukami T; Yuasa T; Tamura Y; Akatsuka T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):672-6. PubMed ID: 17614523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.