These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10491852)

  • 1. Correlative and mechanistic QSAR models in toxicology.
    Lipnick RL
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999; 10(2-3):239-48. PubMed ID: 10491852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, Section 5.
    Auer CM; Nabholz JV; Baetcke KP
    Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Jul; 87():183-97. PubMed ID: 2269224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's risk assessment guidelines.
    Jarabek AM; Farland WH
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):199-216. PubMed ID: 2274984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Databases applicable to quantitative hazard/risk assessment--towards a predictive systems toxicology.
    Waters M; Jackson M
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 233(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 18675838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advancing exposure characterization for chemical evaluation and risk assessment.
    Cohen Hubal EA; Richard A; Aylward L; Edwards S; Gallagher J; Goldsmith MR; Isukapalli S; Tornero-Velez R; Weber E; Kavlock R
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):299-313. PubMed ID: 20574904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
    Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.
    Vogel SA; Roberts JA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 21555473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of computational toxicology methods at the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
    el-Masri HA; Mumtaz MM; Choudhary G; Cibulas W; De Rosa CT
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 205(1-2):63-9. PubMed ID: 12018017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro dermal absorption rate testing of certain chemicals of interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration: summary and evaluation of USEPA's mandated testing.
    Fasano WJ; McDougal JN
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 18501488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention.
    Whaley DA; Meloy TP; Barrett SS; Bedillion EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-73. PubMed ID: 10189582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The new chemicals process at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): structure-activity relationships for hazard identification and risk assessment.
    Wagner PM; Nabholz JV; Kent RJ
    Toxicol Lett; 1995 Sep; 79(1-3):67-73. PubMed ID: 7570675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainties for endocrine disrupters: our view on progress.
    Daston GP; Cook JC; Kavlock RJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 Aug; 74(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 12730617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Knowledge-based expert systems for toxicity and metabolism prediction: DEREK, StAR and METEOR.
    Greene N; Judson PN; Langowski JJ; Marchant CA
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999; 10(2-3):299-314. PubMed ID: 10491855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing computational toxicology models with phytochemicals.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Busta E; Minnier BL; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Feb; 54(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 20024931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A proactive approach to toxic chemicals: moving green chemistry beyond alternatives in the "Safe Chemicals Act of 2010".
    Matus KJ; Zimmerman JB; Beach E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Aug; 44(16):6022-3. PubMed ID: 20704195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tiered chemical testing: a value of information approach.
    Yokota F; Gray G; Hammitt JK; Thompson KM
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1625-39. PubMed ID: 15660617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What industrial hygienists should know about TSCA.
    Lubs PL; Kerfoot EJ; McClellan JM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1982 Jun; 43(6):418-22. PubMed ID: 7113922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human health and the environment can't wait for reform: current opportunities for the federal government and states to address chemical risks under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Trevisan L
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2011; 61(2):385-430. PubMed ID: 25335197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.