BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10491955)

  • 1. Acoustically and electrically evoked contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
    Popelár J; Valvoda J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):61-70. PubMed ID: 10491955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus on 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in anesthetized guinea pigs.
    Popelar J; Mazelová J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 2002 Aug; 170(1-2):116-26. PubMed ID: 12208546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat.
    Khvoles R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):120-6. PubMed ID: 8844192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression findings in children with Asperger's Syndrome.
    Kaf WA; Danesh AA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 77(6):947-54. PubMed ID: 23562236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Increased amplitude of distortion product emissions in the human caused by contralateral low intensity acoustic stimulation].
    Nieschalk M; Beneking R; Stoll W
    HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 9265021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transient-evoked and 2F1-F2 distortion product oto-acoustic emissions in dogs: preliminary findings.
    Sockalingam R; Filippich L; Sommerlad S; Murdoch B; Charles B
    Audiol Neurootol; 1998; 3(6):373-85. PubMed ID: 9732131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from apical and basal perilymphatic electrode positions in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Nuttall AL; Zheng J; Ren T; de Boer E
    Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 152(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 11223283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: a potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the vestibular nerve.
    Chang MY; Song JJ; Kim JS; Koo JW
    Med Hypotheses; 2013 Nov; 81(5):830-3. PubMed ID: 24074898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective assessment of subjective tinnitus through contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions by white noise: effects of frequency, gender, tinnitus bilaterality and age.
    Riga M; Komis A; Maragoudakis P; Korres G; Ferekidis E; Danielides V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2018 Apr; 38(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 29967558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of AC and DC stimulation on chinchilla SOAE amplitude and frequency.
    Sun W; Ding D; Reyes S; Salvi RJ
    Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):137-48. PubMed ID: 11077199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.