These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10492833)

  • 1. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function.
    King-Smith PE; Rose D
    Vision Res; 1997 Jun; 37(12):1595-604. PubMed ID: 9231226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method.
    Anderson AJ
    Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12536138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less).
    Prins N
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):3. PubMed ID: 23750016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: the quick TvC method.
    Lesmes LA; Jeon ST; Lu ZL; Dosher BA
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3160-76. PubMed ID: 16782167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.
    King-Smith PE; Grigsby SS; Vingrys AJ; Benes SC; Supowit A
    Vision Res; 1994 Apr; 34(7):885-912. PubMed ID: 8160402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?
    Serrano-Pedraza I; Vancleef K; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Read JCA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226822. PubMed ID: 31895925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying steep psychometric function slope quickly in clinical applications.
    Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick A
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2476-85. PubMed ID: 20801144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical performance of optimal Bayesian adaptive estimation.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 19476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.
    Lesmes LA; Lu ZL; Baek J; Albright TD
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):17.1-21. PubMed ID: 20377294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical validation of QUEST+ in PSE and JND estimations in visual discrimination tasks.
    Paire A; Hillairet de Boisferon A; Paeye C
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3984-4001. PubMed ID: 36538168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stopping rules in Bayesian adaptive threshold estimation.
    Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA
    Spat Vis; 2005; 18(3):347-74. PubMed ID: 16060232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvement of contrast sensitivity with practice is not compatible with a sensory threshold account.
    Solomon JA; Tyler CW
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jun; 34(6):870-880. PubMed ID: 29036070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are you sure? The relationship between response certainty and performance in visual detection using a perimetry-style task.
    Bedggood P; Ahmad A; Chen A; Lim R; Maqsudi S; Metha A
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):27. PubMed ID: 32845962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.
    Klein SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Order effects in two-alternative forced-choice tasks invalidate adaptive threshold estimates.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2168-2187. PubMed ID: 32232736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracking of nociceptive thresholds using adaptive psychophysical methods.
    Doll RJ; Buitenweg JR; Meijer HG; Veltink PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 23835651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11800464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):147-74. PubMed ID: 17535585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing adaptive procedures for estimating the psychometric function for an auditory gap detection task.
    Shen Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):771-80. PubMed ID: 23417238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.