384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10494022)
1. Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor.
Lim PS; Lee HP; Kho B; Yu YL; Chang SC; Lin YY; Yang CC; Wang TH; Kuo SY; Lin LC
Blood Purif; 1999; 17(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 10494022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of high-flux hemodiafiltration efficiency using an on-line urea monitor.
Canaud B; Bosc JY; Leblanc M; Garred LJ; Vo T; Mion C
Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jan; 31(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9428455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple method for the calculation of dialysis Kt factor as a quantitative measure of removal efficiency of uremic retention solutes: Applicability to high-dialysate vs low-dialysate volume technologies.
Colussi G; Brunati CCM; Gervasi F; Montoli A; Vergani D; Curci F; Minetti E
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233331. PubMed ID: 32469929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration].
Maduell F; Puchades MJ; Navarro V; Torregrosa E; Rius A; Sánchez JJ
Nefrologia; 2005; 25(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16392302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Change from conventional haemodiafiltration to on-line haemodiafiltration.
Maduell F; del Pozo C; Garcia H; Sanchez L; Hdez-Jaras J; Albero MD; Calvo C; Torregrosa I; Navarro V
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 May; 14(5):1202-7. PubMed ID: 10344362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of dialysate flow in on-line hemodiafiltration.
Maduell F; Ojeda R; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Massó E; Gómez M; Rodas L; Bazán G; Jiménez-Hernández M; Piñeiro G; Rico N
Nefrologia; 2015; 35(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 26306957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of an on-line urea monitor compared with urea kinetic model and direct dialysis quantification.
Bosticardo GM; Avalle U; Giacchino F; Molino A; Alloatti S
ASAIO J; 1994; 40(3):M426-30. PubMed ID: 8555551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of convection on small molecule clearances in online hemodiafiltration.
Ficheux A; Argilés A; Mion H; Mion CM
Kidney Int; 2000 Apr; 57(4):1755-63. PubMed ID: 10760112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration.
Rodriguez A; Morena M; Bargnoux AS; Chenine L; Leray-Moragues H; Cristol JP; Canaud B
Artif Organs; 2021 Aug; 45(8):E280-E292. PubMed ID: 33507535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adequacy of haemodialysis and nutrition in maintenance haemodialysis patients: clinical evaluation of a new on-line urea monitor.
Chauveau P; Naret C; Puget J; Zins B; Poignet JL
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1568-73. PubMed ID: 8856213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Change from three times a week on-line hemodiafiltration to short daily on-line hemodiafiltration.
Maduell F; Navarro V; Torregrosa E; Rius A; Dicenta F; Cruz MC; Ferrero JA
Kidney Int; 2003 Jul; 64(1):305-13. PubMed ID: 12787423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On-line haemodiafiltration. Remarkable removal of beta2-microglobulin. Long-term clinical observations.
Lornoy W; Becaus I; Billiouw JM; Sierens L; Van Malderen P; D'Haenens P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2000; 15 Suppl 1():49-54. PubMed ID: 10737167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of dialysis adequacy using the dialysate urea monitor: preliminary experience of the dialysate urea monitor.
Lee WC; Tsai CJ; Huang CC; Lee CC; Chien YS; Hu SA; Wu CH
Ren Fail; 1997 Nov; 19(6):789-97. PubMed ID: 9415936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical cross-over comparison of mid-dilution hemodiafiltration using a novel dialyzer concept and post-dilution hemodiafiltration.
Krieter DH; Falkenhain S; Chalabi L; Collins G; Lemke HD; Canaud B
Kidney Int; 2005 Jan; 67(1):349-56. PubMed ID: 15610261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imprecision of the hemodialysis dose when measured directly from urea removal. Hemodialysis Study Group.
Depner TA; Greene T; Gotch FA; Daugirdas JT; Keshaviah PR; Star RA
Kidney Int; 1999 Feb; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 9987088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Online hemodiafiltration versus acetate-free biofiltration: a prospective crossover study.
Ding F; Ahrenholz P; Winkler RE; Ramlow W; Tiess M; Michelsen A; Pätow W
Artif Organs; 2002 Feb; 26(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 11879247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes.
Pedrini LA; De Cristofaro V; Pagliari B; Samà F
Kidney Int; 2000 Nov; 58(5):2155-65. PubMed ID: 11044237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective comparison of bicarbonate dialysis, hemodiafiltration, and acetate-free biofiltration in the elderly.
Movilli E; Camerini C; Zein H; D'Avolio G; Sandrini M; Strada A; Maiorca R
Am J Kidney Dis; 1996 Apr; 27(4):541-7. PubMed ID: 8678065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration with on-line production of substitution fluid: clinical observation of safety and effectiveness.
Li X; Li M; Liu T; Li L; Duan L; Li Y; Yang G; Guo L
Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Jul; 110(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 9594209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reprocessing high-flux polysulfone dialyzers does not negatively impact solute removal in short-daily online hemodiafiltration.
Melo NC; Moyses RM; Elias RM; Castro MC
Hemodial Int; 2014 Apr; 18(2):473-80. PubMed ID: 24393428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
