These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10495222)

  • 1. Overview of tools for outcomes assessment.
    Schmitt CM
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 9(4):565-72, v-vi. PubMed ID: 10495222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Is there a voucher for the impact of quality assurance/-improvement methods in foreign countries?].
    Simoes E; Boukamp K; Mayer ED; Schmahl FW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Jun; 66(6):370-9. PubMed ID: 15206040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disease-specific outcomes assessment for gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Gralnek IM
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 9(4):665-70, viii. PubMed ID: 10495231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of critical care.
    LaRovere JM; Jeffries HE; Sachdeva RC; Rice TB; Wetzel RC; Cooper DS; Bird GL; Ghanayem NS; Checchia PA; Chang AC; Wessel DL
    Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():130-6. PubMed ID: 19063783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A report on the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Outcomes Initiative: what have we learned and what is its potential?
    Khaitan L; Apelgren K; Hunter J; Traverso LW;
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Mar; 17(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 12469242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes?
    Mack MJ; Herbert M; Prince S; Dewey TM; Magee MJ; Edgerton JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1309-17. PubMed ID: 15942571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic databases and outcomes research.
    Eisen GM
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 9(4):587-94, vi. PubMed ID: 10495224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance in the endoscopy unit: An emphasis on outcomes.
    Brown RD; Goldstein JL
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 9(4):595-607, vi. PubMed ID: 10495225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes research in the ICU: an aid in defining the role of physiotherapy.
    Hanekom SD; Faure M; Coetzee A
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2007; 23(3):125-35. PubMed ID: 17558877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical outcomes research: a progression from performance audits, to assessment of administrative databases, to prospective risk-adjusted analysis - how far have we come?
    Morrato EH; Dillon P; Ziegler M
    Curr Opin Pediatr; 2008 Jun; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 18475103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic outcomes analysis.
    Olson AD; Fendrick AM; Deutsch DE
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2001 Oct; 11(4):557-68, v. PubMed ID: 11689356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.
    Shaller D
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Importance of outcomes research in endoscopic practice.
    Johanson JF
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 9(4):559-64, v. PubMed ID: 10495221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advances in orthopaedic outcomes research.
    Novak EJ; Vail TP; Bozic KJ
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2008; 17(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 18851807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disease-specific outcomes assessment for common bile duct stones.
    Sahai AV
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 9(4):705-15, ix. PubMed ID: 10495235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical evaluation of the use of research tools in evaluating quality of life for people with schizophrenia.
    Hewitt J
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 17229269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disease-specific outcomes assessment for chronic pancreatitis.
    Eisen GM; Zubarik R
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 9(4):717-30, ix. PubMed ID: 10495236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical decision support. How CDS tools impact patient care outcomes.
    Anton BB; Schafer JJ; Micenko A; Wolf DM; DiNucci S; Donovan P; Jordan B
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2009; 23(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 19181200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.