163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10495463)
1. Analysis of binary outcomes in longitudinal studies using weighted estimating equations and discrete-time survival methods: prevalence and incidence of smoking in an adolescent cohort.
Carlin JB; Wolfe R; Coffey C; Patton GC
Stat Med; 1999 Oct; 18(19):2655-79. PubMed ID: 10495463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Australian longitudinal study on male health sampling design and survey weighting: implications for analysis and interpretation of clustered data.
Spittal MJ; Carlin JB; Currier D; Downes M; English DR; Gordon I; Pirkis J; Gurrin L
BMC Public Health; 2016 Oct; 16(Suppl 3):1062. PubMed ID: 28185562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome-related, Auxiliary Variable Sampling Designs for Longitudinal Binary Data.
Schildcrout JS; Schisterman EF; Aldrich MC; Rathouz PJ
Epidemiology; 2018 Jan; 29(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 29068841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simple generalized estimating equations (GEEs) and weighted generalized estimating equations (WGEEs) in longitudinal studies with dropouts: guidelines and implementation in R.
Salazar A; Ojeda B; Dueñas M; Fernández F; Failde I
Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3424-48. PubMed ID: 27059703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes.
Hu FB; Goldberg J; Hedeker D; Flay BR; Pentz MA
Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Apr; 147(7):694-703. PubMed ID: 9554609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing a national survey to investigate smoking behaviour: making comparisons between the General Household Survey, the British Household Panel Survey and the Health Survey for England.
Twigg L
J Public Health Med; 1999 Mar; 21(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10321854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model selection for generalized estimating equations accommodating dropout missingness.
Shen CW; Chen YH
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1046-54. PubMed ID: 22463099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cohort versus cross-sectional design in large field trials: precision, sample size, and a unifying model.
Feldman HA; McKinlay SM
Stat Med; 1994 Jan; 13(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 9061841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The analysis of longitudinal polytomous data: generalized estimating equations and connections with weighted least squares.
Miller ME; Davis CS; Landis JR
Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1033-44. PubMed ID: 8117899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeated Measures Designs and Analysis of Longitudinal Data: If at First You Do Not Succeed-Try, Try Again.
Schober P; Vetter TR
Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):569-575. PubMed ID: 29905618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating risk ratio from any standard epidemiological design by doubling the cases.
Ning Y; Lam A; Reilly M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):157. PubMed ID: 35637431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Innovative strategies using SUDAAN for analysis of health surveys with complex samples.
LaVange LM; Stearns SC; Lafata JE; Koch GG; Shah BV
Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 8931198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smoking in young adolescents: an approach with multilevel discrete choice models.
Pinilla J; González B; Barber P; Santana Y
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2002 Mar; 56(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 11854347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome-dependent sampling from existing cohorts with longitudinal binary response data: study planning and analysis.
Schildcrout JS; Heagerty PJ
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1583-93. PubMed ID: 21457191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple imputation in a longitudinal cohort study: a case study of sensitivity to imputation methods.
Romaniuk H; Patton GC; Carlin JB
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 180(9):920-32. PubMed ID: 25301814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An empirical comparison of multivariable methods for estimating risk of death from coronary heart disease.
Knuiman MW; Vu HT; Segal MR
J Cardiovasc Risk; 1997 Apr; 4(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 9304494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regression analysis of correlated binary outcomes.
Sheu CF
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2000 May; 32(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 10875173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of GEE for analyzing longitudinal binomial data: a primer using data from a tobacco intervention.
Lee JH; Herzog TA; Meade CD; Webb MS; Brandon TH
Addict Behav; 2007 Jan; 32(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 16650625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.
Preisser JS; Lohman KK; Rathouz PJ
Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3035-54. PubMed ID: 12369080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
