These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10495653)

  • 1. A report on how North Carolina is improving mammogram quality.
    Britt GG
    N C Med J; 1999; 60(5):259-60. PubMed ID: 10495653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Chung Y; Britt GG; Burns B; Cole E
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17502258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(214):59750-1. PubMed ID: 10187387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical physicists role under MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act).
    Haus AG
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Nov; 13(11):35-8. PubMed ID: 10139208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum quality standards for mammography facilities.
    Hoppszallern S
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1994 Mar; 13(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 10135179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Pisano ED; Chiu YF; Ni L; Li Y; Britt GG; Johnson RE; Burns B; Cole E; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D
    Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 15147618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Has the mammography quality standards act affected the mammography quality in North Carolina?
    Pisano ED; Schell M; Rollins J; Burns CB; Hall B; Lin Y; Braeuning MP; Burke E; Holliday J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):1089-91. PubMed ID: 10749257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Verdict on MQSA: quality up, but so is financial burden.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Apr; 21(4):33-4, 62. PubMed ID: 10537785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicare, mammography, and the Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992.
    Paquelet JR
    Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):47A-49A. PubMed ID: 8115597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mammogram results in ambulatory care--a mammography quality circle in Braunschweig, Germany, between 1998 and 2001].
    Derra M; Green E; Hintner H; Hübler R; Sabih S; Thieme H; Wezler U; Robra BP; Swart E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Aug; 98(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15487384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are current mammography quality standards act (MQSA) physician guidelines truly adequate?
    Melton AR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W79. PubMed ID: 18647894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeking good care in an outpatient setting.
    Fletcher RH; Carey TS
    Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):18, 20-2. PubMed ID: 10284426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Waging battle against the epidemic. Improving diabetes care in North Carolina.
    Porterfield DS; Reaves J; Patrick-Wubben D
    N C Med J; 2003; 64(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 12774736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MQSA update.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2003; 74(3):202-20; quiz 221-4, 227. PubMed ID: 12584968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Putting managed care regulation in perspective.
    Burke BM
    N C Med J; 2003; 64(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 12774557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography.
    Johnson M
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The history and the effect of the mammography quality assurance legislation in Michigan.
    Osuch JR; Camburn JF; Sienko DG; Potchen EJ
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):263-70. PubMed ID: 8004596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospital Quality Performance Report.
    North Carolina Center for Hospital Quality and Patient Safety
    N C Med J; 2006; 67(6):466-7. PubMed ID: 17393714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality control in mammography].
    Stöffler G
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():48-53. PubMed ID: 3705126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quality control in mammography. 2. Constants check].
    Wischer C; Säbel M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jun; 41(6):197-204. PubMed ID: 3388142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.