196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10498079)
1. Standard incision or no-scalpel vasectomy?
Alderman PM; Morrison GE
J Fam Pract; 1999 Sep; 48(9):719-21. PubMed ID: 10498079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [No-scalpel vasectomy].
Viladoms Fuster JM; Shihua Li P
Arch Esp Urol; 1994 Sep; 47(7):695-701. PubMed ID: 7802473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vas deferens occlusion during no-scalpel vasectomy.
Reynolds RD
J Fam Pract; 1994 Dec; 39(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 7798862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complications in a series of 1224 vasectomies.
Alderman PM
J Fam Pract; 1991 Dec; 33(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 1744603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No-scalpel vasectomy.
Schlegel PN; Goldstein M
Semin Urol; 1992 Nov; 10(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 1485070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expand male services: add no-scalpel vasectomy.
Contracept Technol Update; 2000 May; 21(5):56-7. PubMed ID: 12295904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A phase II randomized controlled trial of a novel male contraception, an intra-vas device.
Song L; Gu Y; Lu W; Liang X; Chen Z
Int J Androl; 2006 Aug; 29(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 16573708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expand male contraceptive services by offering no-scalpel vasectomies.
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Mar; 19(3):29-30, 32. PubMed ID: 12293270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vasal sterilization in China.
Liu X; Li S
Contraception; 1993 Sep; 48(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 8222655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No-scalpel vasectomy outside China.
Xu B; Huang WD
Asian J Androl; 2000 Mar; 2(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 11228932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A minimally invasive vasectomy with the no suture, inline method for vas occlusion.
Marmar JL; Kessler S; Hartanto VH
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2001; 46(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 11720198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study shows many U.S. doctors now use NSV.
Haws JM
AVSC News; 1998; 36(4):3. PubMed ID: 12348825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the no-scalpel vasectomy technique.
Kumar V; Kaza RM; Singh I; Singhal S; Kumaran V
BJU Int; 1999 Feb; 83(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 10233495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of open-end versus closed-end vasectomies: a report on 6220 cases.
Moss WM
Contraception; 1992 Dec; 46(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 1493712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy)--a comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy.
Chen KC; Peng CC; Hsieh HM; Chiang HS
Contraception; 2005 Feb; 71(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 15707567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of effectiveness of two local anesthetic techniques in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy.
White MA; Maatman TJ
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1187-9. PubMed ID: 18158044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No-scalpel vasectomy: a unique approach to the vas.
Pollack AE; Moore C
IPPF Med Bull; 1993 Dec; 27(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 12288623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vasectomy by section, luminal fulguration and fascial interposition: results from 6248 cases.
Schmidt SS
Br J Urol; 1995 Sep; 76(3):373-4; discussion 375. PubMed ID: 7551850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-incision microsurgical vasectomy reversal using no-scalpel vasectomy principles and instruments.
Jarvi K; Grober ED; Lo KC; Patry G
Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):913-5. PubMed ID: 18585765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Serious complications after vasectomy rare, experts say.
Contracept Technol Update; 1990 Dec; 11(12):185. PubMed ID: 12317890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
