These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10499119)

  • 1. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Cummings KJ
    Am J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 8(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 10499119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
    Souza PE; Bishop RD
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hogan CA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):432-41. PubMed ID: 9670535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss.
    Souza PE; Bishop RD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 10783924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 10037062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise.
    Turner CW; Henry BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 12398472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
    Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss.
    McCreery RW; Alexander J; Brennan MA; Hoover B; Kopun J; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):440-7. PubMed ID: 24535558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults.
    Humes LE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007; 18(7):590-603. PubMed ID: 18236646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between age of hearing-loss onset, hearing-loss duration, and speech recognition in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.
    Seldran F; Gallego S; Micheyl C; Veuillet E; Truy E; Thai-Van H
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Aug; 12(4):519-34. PubMed ID: 21350969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding.
    Hornsby BW; Johnson EE; Picou E
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):543-55. PubMed ID: 21336138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses.
    Small SA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Dec; 25(6):611-23. PubMed ID: 15604921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Patient-Centered, Provider-Facilitated Approach to the Refinement of Nonlinear Frequency Compression Parameters Based on Subjective Preference Ratings of Amplified Sound Quality.
    Johnson EE; Light KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):689-702. PubMed ID: 26333877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Plyler PN; Fleck EL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 16787899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception with steeply sloping hearing loss: effects of frequency transposition.
    McDermott HJ; Dean MR
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 11201322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of single-channel compression on temporal speech information.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 39(5):901-11. PubMed ID: 8898245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.