These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10499121)

  • 1. A clinical trial of the ReSound IC4 hearing device.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Pavlovic CV
    Am J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 8(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 10499121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Clinical Trial of the ReSound BT2 Personal Hearing System.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Pavlovic CV
    Am J Audiol; 1998 Oct; 7(2):85-100. PubMed ID: 26649522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective and subjective hearing aid assessment outcomes.
    Mendel LL
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 18056880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Edwards B; Olson L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000; 11(10):540-60. PubMed ID: 11198072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the aided performance and benefit provided by a linear and a two-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aid.
    Humes LE; Christensen L; Thomas T; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A; Bentler R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 10025544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial Group.
    Larson VD; Williams DW; Henderson WG; Luethke LE; Beck LB; Noffsinger D; Wilson RH; Dobie RA; Haskell GB; Bratt GW; Shanks JE; Stelmachowicz P; Studebaker GA; Boysen AE; Donahue A; Canalis R; Fausti SA; Rappaport BZ
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(14):1806-13. PubMed ID: 11025833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in performance between Oticon MultiFocus Compact and ReSound BT2-E hearing aids.
    Valente M; Sammeth CA; Potts LG; Wynne MK; Wagner-Escobar M; Coughlin M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Aug; 8(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 9272751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of amplification and speechreading on consonant recognition by persons with impaired hearing.
    Walden BE; Grant KW; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 11527039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
    Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of single-channel linear amplification and two-channel wide-dynamic-range-compression amplification by means of an independent-group design.
    Humes LE; Humes LE; Wilson DL
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 15248803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multi-center, double blind clinical trial comparing benefit from three commonly used hearing aid circuits.
    Larson VD; Williams DW; Henderson WG; Luethke LE; Beck LB; Noffsinger D; Bratt GW; Dobie RA; Fausti SA; Haskell GB; Rappaport BZ; Shanks JE; Wilson RH
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 12195168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.