These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10499225)
1. Non-response in survey research: a methodological discussion and development of an explanatory model. Barriball KL; While AE J Adv Nurs; 1999 Sep; 30(3):677-86. PubMed ID: 10499225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring variables underlying non-response in a survey of nurses and nurses' aides in practice. Barriball KL; While AE J Adv Nurs; 1999 Apr; 29(4):894-904. PubMed ID: 10215981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practical issues in survey sampling. Johnson M; Marsden J; Day E Aust J Adv Nurs; 1998; 15(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 9807275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The methodological silence?--A look at the research landscape of mixed method studies]. Mayer H Pflege; 2013 Oct; 26(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 24088648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Focus groups: an exciting approach to clinical nursing research. Gulanick M; Keough V Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1997; 12(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 9195644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A research study exploring the patient's view of quality of life using the case study method. Dale AE J Adv Nurs; 1995 Dec; 22(6):1128-34. PubMed ID: 8675867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Data collecting in grounded theory--some practical issues. Duffy K; Ferguson C; Watson H Nurse Res; 2004; 11(4):67-78. PubMed ID: 15227900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing and documenting a qualitative methodology. Reid B J Adv Nurs; 1991 May; 16(5):544-51. PubMed ID: 1856373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breaking from binaries - using a sequential mixed methods design. Larkin PM; Begley CM; Devane D Nurse Res; 2014 Mar; 21(4):8-12. PubMed ID: 24673347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing quantitative data errors: tips for clinical researchers. Schneider JK; Deenan A Appl Nurs Res; 2004 May; 17(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 15154125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The adaptation of an experimental sampling procedure for application in naturalistic psychiatric nursing research settings. Rushforth D J Adv Nurs; 1994 May; 19(5):932-7. PubMed ID: 8056922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting of instrument validity and reliability in selected clinical nursing journals, 1989. Selby-Harrington ML; Mehta SM; Jutsum V; Riportella-Muller R; Quade D J Prof Nurs; 1994; 10(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 8144756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementing randomized assignment in a nursing clinical randomized control trial. Winsett RP; Thompson DA; Gower G; Leimig R; Lloyd M; Hathaway DK Prog Transplant; 2007 Jun; 17(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 17624138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Tools for understanding and performing scientific studies: do nurses need statistics?]. Hartwig M Pflege Z; 2009 Aug; 62(8):491-4. PubMed ID: 19728443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Breaching the wall: interviewing people from other cultures. Birks MJ; Chapman Y; Francis K J Transcult Nurs; 2007 Apr; 18(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 17416717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Nurses' aides and the practice of nursing research: study of a reality in hospitals]. Rozendo CA; Collet N; de Albuquerque MC Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 1995 Jul; 3(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 7551075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic sampling: theory and clinical methods. Floyd JA Nurs Res; 1993; 42(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 8415044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical research methods in the nursing discipline framework]. Goulet C Rech Soins Infirm; 1999 Dec; (59):20-6. PubMed ID: 12037839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sampling: how you choose people is as important as how you analyse their data. Jones MP; Attia JR Med J Aust; 2017 Feb; 206(2):67-68. PubMed ID: 28152350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]