These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10501335)

  • 21. Myocardial contrast echocardiography: too much, too soon?
    DeMaria AN; Cotter B; Ohmori K
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Nov; 32(5):1270-1. PubMed ID: 9809935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of infarcted myocardium with real time myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography.
    Tousek P; Orban M; Martinoff S; Firschke C
    Heart; 2005 Dec; 91(12):1568-72. PubMed ID: 15774606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with revascularized myocardial infarction: comparison between intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and 99mTc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography.
    Sieswerda GT; Klein LJ; Kamp O; Aiazian EA; Lepper W; Visser FC; Hanrath P; Visser CA
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2004 Jan; 5(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15113011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography.
    Lipiec P; Wejner-Mik P; Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Kuśmierek J; Płachcińska A; Szumiński R; Peruga JZ; Kasprzak JD
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Aug; 21(8):941-7. PubMed ID: 18385014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between myocardial contrast echocardiography and (99m)technetium sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography determined myocardial viability in predicting hard cardiac events following acute myocardial infarction.
    Dwivedi G; Janardhanan R; Hayat SA; Lim TK; Senior R
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1184-8. PubMed ID: 19840559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resting Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography for the Evaluation of Coronary Microcirculation Dysfunction in Patients With Early Coronary Artery Disease.
    Li X; He S; Zhang YS; Chen Y; He JC
    Clin Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 39(8):453-8. PubMed ID: 27163691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of coronary artery disease using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with dual-isotope resting thallium-201/stress technectium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Lin SL; Chiou KR; Huang WC; Peng NJ; Tsay DG; Liu CP
    Heart Vessels; 2006 Jul; 21(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 16865298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of coronary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Kaul S; Senior R; Dittrich H; Raval U; Khattar R; Lahiri A
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 9264483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for pharmacologic stress testing: is quantitative estimation of myocardial blood flow reserve necessary?
    Korosoglou G; da Silva KG; Labadze N; Dubart AE; Hansen A; Rosenberg M; Zehelein J; Kuecherer H
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2004 Jan; 17(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14712180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feasibility of continuous venous infusion of SonoVue for qualitative assessment of reversible coronary perfusion defects in stress myocardial contrast echocardiography.
    Yip GW; Chandrasekaran K; Miller TD; Hagen ME; Langins AP; Khandheria BK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2003 Dec; 19(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 14690186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of myocardial perfusion with intravenous contrast echocardiography: comparison with (99) Tc-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography and dobutamine echocardiography.
    Palagi C; Mengozzi G; Rovai D; Volterrani D; Dell'Anna R; Giorgi D; Petronio AS; Di Bello V; Mariani M
    Echocardiography; 2003 Jan; 20(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12848696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Non-invasive detection of coronary artery stenosis: a comparison among power-Doppler contrast echo, 99Tc-Sestamibi SPECT and echo wall-motion analysis.
    Rocchi G; Fallani F; Bracchetti G; Rapezzi C; Ferlito M; Levorato M; Reggiani LB; Branzi A
    Coron Artery Dis; 2003 May; 14(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 12702928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adenosine myocardial contrast echo in intermediate severity coronary stenoses: a prospective two-center study.
    Firschke C; Andrássy P; Linka AZ; Busch R; Martinoff S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Jun; 23(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 17006730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for predicting functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction.
    Borges AC; Richter WS; Witzel C; Witzel M; Grohmann A; Reibis RK; Rutsch W; Küchler I; Munz DL; Baumann G
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2002 Aug; 18(4):257-68. PubMed ID: 12123318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Jeetley P; Hickman M; Kamp O; Lang RM; Thomas JD; Vannan MA; Vanoverschelde JL; van der Wouw PA; Senior R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 47(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 16386678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of the physiologic significance of coronary disease with dipyridamole real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography.
    Peltier M; Vancraeynest D; Pasquet A; Ay T; Roelants V; D'hondt AM; Melin JA; Vanoverschelde JL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jan; 43(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 14736446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of left bundle-branch block on cardiac structure, function, perfusion, and perfusion reserve: implications for myocardial contrast echocardiography versus radionuclide perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease.
    Hayat SA; Dwivedi G; Jacobsen A; Lim TK; Kinsey C; Senior R
    Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(14):1832-41. PubMed ID: 18378614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Incremental value of parametric quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by triggered Low-Power myocardial contrast echocardiography.
    Yu EH; Skyba DM; Leong-Poi H; Sloggett C; Jamorski M; Garg R; Iwanochko RM; Siu SC
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 May; 43(10):1807-13. PubMed ID: 15145104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Absolute myocardial blood flow determination using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during adenosine stress: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Abdelmoneim SS; Dhoble A; Bernier M; Moir S; Hagen ME; Ness SA; Abdel-Kader SS; Pellikka PA; Mulvagh SL
    Heart; 2009 Oct; 95(20):1662-8. PubMed ID: 19584062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison between myocardial contrast echocardiography and single-photon emission computed tomography for predicting transmurality of acute myocardial infarction.
    Hayat SA; Janardhanan R; Moon JC; Pennell DJ; Senior R
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 97(12):1718-21. PubMed ID: 16765120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.