These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Surveillance cultures to monitor quality of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing. Moses FM; Lee J Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jan; 98(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 12526940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effectiveness of flexible gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing. Ribeiro MM; de Oliveira AC; Ribeiro SM; Watanabe E; de Resende Stoianoff MA; Ferreira JA Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 34(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 23388368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The feasibility and safety of disposable endoscope vs. conventional endoscope for upper gastrointestinal tract examination: a multicenter, randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial. Li DF; Shi RY; Tian YH; Xu ZL; Zhou YS; Sun XJ; Cai JW; Fang YY; Peng H; Wang JM; Dong T; Cai YD; Yao J; Wang LS Z Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 60(9):1314-1319. PubMed ID: 34768288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biofilm accumulation in new flexible gastroscope channels in clinical use. Primo MGB; Tipple AFV; Costa DM; Guadagnin SVT; Azevedo AS; Leão-Vasconcelos LSNO; Alfa M; Vickery K Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 34128460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Persistent contamination on colonoscopes and gastroscopes detected by biologic cultures and rapid indicators despite reprocessing performed in accordance with guidelines. Ofstead CL; Wetzler HP; Doyle EM; Rocco CK; Visrodia KH; Baron TH; Tosh PK Am J Infect Control; 2015 Aug; 43(8):794-801. PubMed ID: 26234219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing residual contamination and damage inside flexible endoscopes over time. Ofstead CL; Wetzler HP; Eiland JE; Heymann OL; Held SB; Shaw MJ Am J Infect Control; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1675-1677. PubMed ID: 27614710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inconsistencies in endoscope-reprocessing and infection-control guidelines: the importance of endoscope drying. Muscarella LF Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 101(9):2147-54. PubMed ID: 16968511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prospective clinical trial of magnetic-anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for large early gastric cancer (with videos). Gotoda T; Oda I; Tamakawa K; Ueda H; Kobayashi T; Kakizoe T Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jan; 69(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18599053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A review of reprocessing techniques of flexible nasopharyngoscopes. Collins WO Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Sep; 141(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 19716004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Feasibility of high-volume screening sigmoidoscopy using a flexible fiberoptic endoscope and a disposable sheath system. Schroy PC; Wilson S; Afdhal N Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jul; 91(7):1331-7. PubMed ID: 8677989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Mulcahy HE; Riches A; Kiely M; Farthing MJ; Fairclough PD Endoscopy; 2001 Apr; 33(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 11315891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Elastic band ligation of hemorrhoids: flexible gastroscope or rigid proctoscope? Cazemier M; Felt-Bersma RJ; Cuesta MA; Mulder CJ World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 13(4):585-7. PubMed ID: 17278225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective evaluation of costs of disposable accessories in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Kim-Deobald J; Kozarek RA; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ; Raltz S Gastrointest Endosc; 1993; 39(6):763-5. PubMed ID: 8293897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]