These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10502164)
41. Evaluation of practice efficiency with a novel sheathed flexible cystoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Krebs A; Borin JF; Kim IY; Jackson DJ; McDougall EM; Clayman RV Urology; 2007 Nov; 70(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 17919698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A prospective randomized trial comparing the use of the flexible gastroscope versus the bronchoscope in the management of foreign body ingestion. Chu KM; Choi HK; Tuen HH; Law SY; Branicki FJ; Wong J Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Jan; 47(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9468419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Joystick interfaces are not suitable for robotized endoscope applied to NOTES. Allemann P; Ott L; Asakuma M; Masson N; Perretta S; Dallemagne B; Coumaros D; De Mathelin M; Soler L; Marescaux J Surg Innov; 2009 Jun; 16(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19546121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Surveillance culture of endoscope to monitor the quality of high-level disinfection of gastrointestinal reprocessing. Chiu KW; Fong TV; Wu KL; Chiu YC; Chou YP; Kuo CM; Chuah SK; Kuo CH; Chiou SS; ChangChien CS Hepatogastroenterology; 2010; 57(99-100):531-4. PubMed ID: 20698222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Liquid disinfecting and sterilization reprocessors used for flexible endoscopes. Health Devices; 1994 Jun; 23(6):212-53. PubMed ID: 7852072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A randomized trial of single versus double high-level disinfection of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes using standard automated reprocessing. Bartles RL; Leggett JE; Hove S; Kashork CD; Wang L; Oethinger M; Baxter L; Brandabur JJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):306-313.e2. PubMed ID: 29476847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Prospective, randomized comparison of a prototype endoscope with deflecting working channels versus a conventional double-channel endoscope for rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in an established experimental simulation model (with video). Jung Y; Kato M; Lee J; Gromski MA; Chuttani R; Matthes K Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Nov; 78(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 23747065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation. van der Ploeg K; de Jonge PJF; Lammers WJ; Koch AD; Vos MC; Paulsen V; Aabakken L; Bruno M Endosc Int Open; 2024 Mar; 12(3):E428-E434. PubMed ID: 38504741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Prospective microbiologic evaluation of the forceps elevator in closed-channel duodenoscopes after reprocessing. Paula H; Tribl B; Presterl E; Diab-El Schahawi M Am J Infect Control; 2017 Feb; 45(2):121-125. PubMed ID: 28341284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Surveillance culture monitoring of double-balloon enteroscopy reprocessing with high-level disinfection. Chiu KW; Lu LS; Wu KL; Lin MT; Hu ML; Tai WC; Chiu YC; Chuah SK; Hu TH Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Apr; 42(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 21950739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Reprocessing practice in digestive endoscopy units of district hospitals: results of a Portuguese National Survey. Soares JB; Gonçalves R; Banhudo A; Pedrosa J Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Nov; 23(11):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21862930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy using an upper endoscope is better tolerated by women. Farraye FA; Horton K; Hersey H; Trnka Y; Heeren T; Provenzale D Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 15180728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Namburar S; von Renteln D; Damianos J; Bradish L; Barrett J; Aguilera-Fish A; Cushman-Roisin B; Pohl H Gut; 2022 Jul; 71(7):1326-1331. PubMed ID: 34853058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Endoscope storage time: assessment of microbial colonization up to 21 days after reprocessing. Brock AS; Steed LL; Freeman J; Garry B; Malpas P; Cotton P Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 May; 81(5):1150-4. PubMed ID: 25484321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Endoscope reprocessing and repair costs. Burdick JS; Hambrick D Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2004 Oct; 14(4):717-24, ix-x. PubMed ID: 15363776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Prospective randomized comparison of short-access mother-baby cholangioscopy versus direct cholangioscopy with ultraslim gastroscopes. Pohl J; Meves VC; Mayer G; Behrens A; Frimberger E; Ell C Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):609-16. PubMed ID: 23680176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: a randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance. Campo R; Montserrat A; Brullet E Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 9693891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]