These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1050321)
1. [Power and the authorities]. Meerschart J Infirm Fr; 1976 Dec; (180):11-4. PubMed ID: 1050321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. RU 486 and the politics of drug regulation in the United States and France. Kramnick RK Cornell Int Law J; 1992; 25():667-718. PubMed ID: 11656340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion law reform in France. Stetson DM J Comp Fam Stud; 1986; 17(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 11655823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. France takes the lead on medical ethics. Patel T New Sci; 1992 Dec; 136(1850):8. PubMed ID: 11656188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The French law on the protection of persons participating in biomedical research: origins and history. Huriet C Int Dig Health Legis; 1992; 43(2):391-3. PubMed ID: 11651637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993. Axel DA Hastings Law J; 1994; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. French law clamps down on tissue traders. Patel T New Sci; 1994 Jul; 143(1932):6. PubMed ID: 11656356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Laetrile controversy: background and issues. Eddy CH Ariz Law Rev; 1978; 20(3):825-60. PubMed ID: 11662772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Symposium on the Law of 20 December 1988 Concerning Biomedical Research on Human Subjects: Protection Committee or Ethics Committee? J Int Bioethique; 1993 Mar; 4(Special Issue):61-4. PubMed ID: 11652137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confronting a new obstacle to reproductive choice: encouraging the development of RU-486 through reform of products liability law. Rubin LA Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):131-59. PubMed ID: 11656168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion policy in the post-Webster age. Halva-Neubauer G Publius; 1990; 20(3):27-44. PubMed ID: 11656128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. All-out foes of abortion active on many fronts. Kenrick C Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 1979 Jan; ():8. PubMed ID: 11649085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High court pondering fine points of abortion issue. Wood AP Ob Gyn News; 1982 Jan 15-31; 18(2):1, 36-37. PubMed ID: 11655557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicaid and the abortion right. Blauner MA George Washington Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 44(3):404-17. PubMed ID: 11662252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment. Caron WR Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The "right" of abortion funding. Noonan JT Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11651720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Groups seek to force new 'Baby Doe' laws. Med World News; 1984 Jun; 25(12):14. PubMed ID: 11645514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The phenomenon of antique laws: can a state revive old abortion laws in a new era? Plave EF George Washington Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 58(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11656013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Governmental control of research in positive eugenics. Bass IS Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1974; 7(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 11661095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]