These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10503755)
1. The effect of single engine fixed wing air transport on rate-responsive pacemakers. De Rotte AA; Van Der Kemp P Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Sep; 70(9):892-6. PubMed ID: 10503755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electromagnetic interference in pacemakers in single-engine fixed-wing aircraft: a European perspective. De Rotte AA; Van Der Kemp P Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Mar; 73(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 11908881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A blended sensor restores chronotropic response more favorably than an accelerometer alone in pacemaker patients: the LIFE study results. Coman J; Freedman R; Koplan BA; Reeves R; Santucci P; Stolen KQ; Kraus SM; Meyer TE; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1433-42. PubMed ID: 18950301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heart rate changes during acute mental stress with closed loop stimulation: report on two single-blinded, pacemaker studies. Chandiramani S; Cohorn LC; Chandiramani S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Aug; 30(8):976-84. PubMed ID: 17669080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation by serial standardized testing of a new rate-responsive pacemaker sensor based on variations in myocardial contractility. Clémenty J; Kobeissi A; Garrigue S; Jaïs P; Le Métayer P; Haïssaguerre M Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 11333049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two activity-controlled rate-adaptive pacing principles: acceleration versus vibration. Alt E; Matula M Cardiol Clin; 1992 Nov; 10(4):635-58. PubMed ID: 1423378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is a dual-sensor pacemaker appropriate in patients with sino-atrial disease? Results from the DUSISLOG study. Padeletti L; Pieragnoli P; Di Biase L; Colella A; Landolina M; Moro E; Orazi S; Vicentini A; Maglia G; Pensabene O; Raciti G; Barold SS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jan; 29(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 16441715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Modern cardiac pacing. II. Rate responsive pacemakers: clinical experience]. Novák M; Psenicka M; Smola M; Bultas J; Cermák S Vnitr Lek; 1992 Dec; 38(12):1172-80. PubMed ID: 1296346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate-responsive pacing using electrographic parameters as sensors. Connelly DT; Rickards AF Cardiol Clin; 1992 Nov; 10(4):659-69. PubMed ID: 1423379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Sommer T; Naehle CP; Yang A; Zeijlemaker V; Hackenbroch M; Schmiedel A; Meyer C; Strach K; Skowasch D; Vahlhaus C; Litt H; Schild H Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 16966587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Permanent physiological pacing. Rossi P; Rognoni G; Aina F; Occhetta E G Ital Cardiol; 1984 Oct; 14(10):784-7. PubMed ID: 6519389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accelerometer-derived time intervals during various pacing modes in patients with biventricular pacemakers: comparison with normals. Marcus FI; Sorrell V; Zanetti J; Bosnos M; Baweja G; Perlick D; Ott P; Indik J; He DS; Gear K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1476-81. PubMed ID: 18070301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Heart rate and rhythm during flight in civil pilots undergoing aerobatics. A Holter study]. Pucheu A; Chanton E; Lechat P; Muzergues G; Revellat F; Pucheu M Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Nov; 86(11):1589-95. PubMed ID: 7516649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flight simulator platform motion and air transport pilot training. Lee AT; Bussolari SR Aviat Space Environ Med; 1989 Feb; 60(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 2930424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Physical performance with rate-responsive pacemakers]. Solèr M; Erne P; Pfisterer M; Cueni T; Burkart F Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1986 Nov; 116(46):1601-3. PubMed ID: 3787236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and quality of life comparison of accelerometer, piezoelectric crystal, and blended sensors in DDDR-paced patients with sinus node dysfunction in the mode selection trial (MOST). Shukla HH; Flaker GC; Hellkamp AS; James EA; Lee KL; Goldman L; Orav EJ; Lamas GA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Aug; 28(8):762-70. PubMed ID: 16105001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Dual chamber rate responsive pacing and chronotropic insufficiency. Comparison of double and respiratory sensors]. Lascault G; Pansard Y; Scholl JM; Abraham P; Dupuis JM; Victor J; Copie X; Alonso C; Sarrazin E Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2001 Mar; 94(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 11338253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Study on the activity--heart rate prediction system for motion sensed rate responsive pacemakers]. Guo P; Sun W; Jin J; Zhao Q; Chen X; Kong S; Huang Y Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 35(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 22242376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]