BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10504884)

  • 1. The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects.
    Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):265-92. PubMed ID: 10504884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual representation of malleable and rigid objects that deform as they rotate.
    Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):335-55. PubMed ID: 11318051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects.
    Balas BJ; Sinha P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 19429954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning sequence of views of three-dimensional objects: the effect of temporal coherence on object memory.
    Liu T
    Perception; 2007; 36(9):1320-33. PubMed ID: 18196699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A; Reid SL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):238-55. PubMed ID: 11409102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The spatial and temporal characteristics of perceiving 3-D structure from motion.
    Eby DW
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Feb; 51(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 1549434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching.
    Lawson R; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Apr; 22(2):395-416. PubMed ID: 8934852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects.
    Lawson R
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1170-81. PubMed ID: 15813498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
    Lawson R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):221-45. PubMed ID: 10504882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory.
    Srinivas K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Jul; 21(4):1019-36. PubMed ID: 7673865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys.
    Logothetis NK; Pauls J; Poggio T
    Curr Biol; 1995 May; 5(5):552-63. PubMed ID: 7583105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations.
    Norman JF; Todd JT
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Mar; 53(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 8483692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging preserves the ability to perceive 3D object shape from static but not deforming boundary contours.
    Norman JF; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):198-207. PubMed ID: 18632085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys.
    Logothetis NK; Pauls J; Bülthoff HH; Poggio T
    Curr Biol; 1994 May; 4(5):401-14. PubMed ID: 7922354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition.
    Vetter T; Poggio T; Bülthoff HH
    Curr Biol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7922306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. View combination in moving objects: the role of motion in discriminating between novel views of similar and distinctive objects by humans and pigeons.
    Friedman A; Vuong QC; Spetch ML
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):594-607. PubMed ID: 19232366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognizing rotated views of objects: interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 12747500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures.
    Lawson R; Humphreys GW; Watson DG
    Perception; 1994; 23(5):595-614. PubMed ID: 7800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.