These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10505013)

  • 1. Characterization of new portal film systems for radiotherapy verification.
    Langmack KA; Goss V
    Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):479-84. PubMed ID: 10505013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison of different film systems for radiotherapy portal imaging.
    Foulkes KM; Ostwald PM; Kron T
    Med Dosim; 2001; 26(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 11704465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast improvement in a new radiotherapy imaging system.
    Ostinelli A; Frigerio M; Gelosa S; Monti AF; Cacciatori M; Cazzaniga F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1999 Apr; 175(4):182-4. PubMed ID: 10230461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Portal verification using the KODAK ACR 2000 RT storage phosphor plate system and EC films. A semiquantitative comparison.
    Geyer P; Blank H; Alheit H
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Mar; 182(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 16520912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new verification film system for routine quality control of radiation fields: Kodak EC-L.
    Hermann A; Bratengeier K; Priske A; Flentje M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2000 Jun; 176(6):274-7. PubMed ID: 10897254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The electronic portal imaging system Siemens Beamview Plus versus the conventional verification films CEA-TVS and DuPont COL-7. A critical appraisal of visual image quality.
    Gagel B; Schramm O; Harms W; Mulhern A; Wenz F; van Kampen M; Wannenmacher M; Eble MJ
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Aug; 178(8):446-52. PubMed ID: 12240551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Portal verification of high-energy electron beams using their photon contamination by film-cassette systems.
    Geyer P; Baus WW; Baumann M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Jan; 182(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16404519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry of high energy photon and electron beams with CEA films.
    Cheng CW; Das IJ
    Med Phys; 1996 Jul; 23(7):1225-32. PubMed ID: 8839417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short communication: portal imaging with film-cassette combinations: what film should we use?
    Roberts R
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):70-1. PubMed ID: 8785625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of portal verification radiography using EC-L film in electron beam therapy.
    Kawai M; Tada T; Hosono M; Takada Y; Ishii K; Nagahata T; Sahara T; Inoue Y
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):447-51. PubMed ID: 19124568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of several Dupont portal film systems.
    Li H; Xu Z; Almond PR
    Med Dosim; 1996; 21(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8899683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of portal screen-film technology and five radiologists' evaluations of some existing products.
    Walker MA; Steinheimer DN; Weir VA; Homco LD; Green RW; Morris EL; Hess ME
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 10519314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a cassette-screen-film combination for radiation therapy portal localization imaging with improved contrast.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE; Huff KE; Monte S; Schlager BA; Atanas M; Matloubieh A
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1605-8. PubMed ID: 9350713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An unexpected artefact with low-contrast high-energy film.
    Cowley I; Thomas S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):N17-21. PubMed ID: 16357425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short communication: use of the European image quality criteria for screen-film comparison--application for asymmetric systems.
    Guibelalde E; Morillo A; Fernandez JM; Vañó E
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):64-9. PubMed ID: 8785624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A sensitometric comparison of Fuji Super HR-G and Kodak T-mat G panoramic films.
    Benson BW; Frederiksen NL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 May; 79(5):646-8. PubMed ID: 7600231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.