These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10505181)

  • 1. Disparity detection in anticorrelated stereograms.
    Cumming BG; Shapiro SE; Parker AJ
    Perception; 1998; 27(11):1367-77. PubMed ID: 10505181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays.
    Becker S; Bowd C; Shorter S; King K; Patterson R
    Vision Res; 1999 Jan; 39(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 10326139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Cumming BG; Read JC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004906. PubMed ID: 27196696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Binocular functional exploration: fundamental aspects and analysis by the Fusio-Test].
    Bourdy C; Cottin F; James Y
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 3057057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Depth perception not found in human observers for static or dynamic anti-correlated random dot stereograms.
    Hibbard PB; Scott-Brown KC; Haigh EC; Adrain M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84087. PubMed ID: 24416195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reversed Depth in Anticorrelated Random-Dot Stereograms and the Central-Peripheral Difference in Visual Inference.
    Zhaoping L; Ackermann J
    Perception; 2018 Jan; ():301006618758571. PubMed ID: 29514559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay.
    Cogan AI; Lomakin AJ; Rossi AF
    Vision Res; 1993 Sep; 33(14):1959-75. PubMed ID: 8249313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4.
    Tanabe S; Doi T; Umeda K; Fujita I
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2683-99. PubMed ID: 16000525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unconscious adaptation: a new illusion of depth induced by stimulus features without depth.
    Hayashi R; Miyawaki Y; Maeda T; Tachi S
    Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2773-82. PubMed ID: 14568094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effects on depth perception and pattern recognition in random dot stereograms by changing the matrix dot density].
    Pressmar SB; Haase W
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Oct; 98(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 11699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-reversed binocular dot-pairs in random-dot stereograms for depth perception in central visual field: Probing the dynamics of feedforward-feedback processes in visual inference.
    Zhaoping L
    Vision Res; 2021 Sep; 186():124-139. PubMed ID: 34091397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial scale interactions in stereo sensitivity and the neural representation of binocular disparity.
    Smallman HS; MacLeod DI
    Perception; 1997; 26(8):977-94. PubMed ID: 9509158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual latency and complex random-dot stereograms.
    Bradshaw MF; Rogers BJ; De Bruyn B
    Perception; 1995; 24(7):749-59. PubMed ID: 8710438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Masson GS; Busettini C; Miles FA
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):283-6. PubMed ID: 9305842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation.
    Neri P; Parker AJ; Blakemore C
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6754):695-8. PubMed ID: 10537107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. At least at the level of inferior temporal cortex, the stereo correspondence problem is solved.
    Janssen P; Vogels R; Liu Y; Orban GA
    Neuron; 2003 Feb; 37(4):693-701. PubMed ID: 12597865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereoscopic evoked responses to crossed and uncrossed disparity accompanying simulated refractive error.
    Neill RA; Dunlop P; Dunlop DB; Fenelon B; Dunlop C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1988 Oct; 72(10):759-63. PubMed ID: 3191078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus dependence of disparity coding in primate visual area V4.
    Hegdé J; Van Essen DC
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 93(1):620-6. PubMed ID: 15342712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.