These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10505293)

  • 1. Principles of the epidemiological approach to QEP.
    Moolgavkar SH; Moller H; Woodward A
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (131):61-73. PubMed ID: 10505293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The epidemiologist facing assessment of low risk].
    Rylander R
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1992; 40(6):383-90. PubMed ID: 1287738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of exposure and outcome in epidemiological studies used for quantitative estimation and prediction of risk.
    Armstrong B; Boffetta P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (131):75-102. PubMed ID: 10505294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supplementary data collection with case-cohort analysis to address potential confounding in a cohort study of thromboembolism in oral contraceptive initiators matched on claims-based propensity scores.
    Eng PM; Seeger JD; Loughlin J; Clifford CR; Mentor S; Walker AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Mar; 17(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 18215000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kin-cohort evaluation of relative risks of genetic variants.
    Saunders CL; Begg CB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 24(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 12652526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer and NSAID use: a meta-analysis.
    Khuder SA; Mutgi AB
    Br J Cancer; 2001 May; 84(9):1188-92. PubMed ID: 11336469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Organization of investigations and evaluation of health risk in modern epidemiology].
    Kosarev VV; Babanov SA
    Gig Sanit; 2001; (4):64-6. PubMed ID: 11530646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of soy intake and breast cancer risk.
    Trock BJ; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Apr; 98(7):459-71. PubMed ID: 16595782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A statistical test for the equality of differently adjusted incidence rate ratios.
    Hoffmann K; Pischon T; Schulz M; Schulze MB; Ray J; Boeing H
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 18230678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [True or false findings? Application of Bayes principles can improve the assessment].
    Stromberg U; Björk J; Feychting M; Alfredsson L; Ahlbom A
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Feb 21-27; 104(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 17396456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of control selection in nested case-control studies: the example of exposure to antiretroviral treatment (ART) and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in the French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH-ANRS CO4).
    Guiguet M; Mary-Krause M; Ename B; Costagliola D; Grabar S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 May; 17(5):468-74. PubMed ID: 18324608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiological risk assessment of mobile phones and cancer: where can we improve?
    Auvinen A; Toivo T; Tokola K
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Dec; 15(6):516-23. PubMed ID: 17106332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Basic occupational epidemiologic measures.
    Marsh GM
    Occup Med; 1996; 11(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 8887377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses.
    Peters J; Mengersen K
    Eval Health Prof; 2008 Dec; 31(4):370-89. PubMed ID: 19000980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting epidemiologic research: lessons from studies of childhood cancer.
    Linet MS; Wacholder S; Zahm SH
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jul; 112(1 Pt 2):218-32. PubMed ID: 12837914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sunlight and reduced risk of cancer: is the real story vitamin D?
    Egan KM; Sosman JA; Blot WJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Feb; 97(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 15687354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative and non-positive epidemiological studies.
    Axelson O
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 15212214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Case-control survey methodology in the epidemiology of cancer. I. Principles, planning and conduct of the surveys].
    Jamart J; Schifflers E
    Arch Belg; 1988; 46(3-4):168-92. PubMed ID: 3218998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.