278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10506603)
1. Cost-utility analysis of chemotherapy using paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinorelbine for patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer.
Leung PP; Tannock IF; Oza AM; Puodziunas A; Dranitsaris G
J Clin Oncol; 1999 Oct; 17(10):3082-90. PubMed ID: 10506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness of treatment options in advanced breast cancer in the UK.
Brown RE; Hutton J; Burrell A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(11):1091-102. PubMed ID: 11735676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Population-based pharmacoeconomic model for adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.
Verma S; Ilersich AL
Oncologist; 2003; 8(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 12773745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Clegg A; Scott DA; Sidhu M; Hewitson P; Waugh N
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(32):1-195. PubMed ID: 12065068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A medico-economic evaluation of second line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: comparison between docetaxel, paclitaxel, and vinorelbine].
Launois RJ; Reboul-Marty JM; Bonneterre J
Bull Cancer; 1997 Jul; 84(7):709-21. PubMed ID: 9339197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cost-utility analysis of second-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Docetaxel versus paclitaxel versus vinorelbine.
Launois R; Reboul-Marty J; Henry B; Bonneterre J
Pharmacoeconomics; 1996 Nov; 10(5):504-21. PubMed ID: 10169397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vinorelbine and cisplatin for metastatic breast cancer: a salvage regimen in patients progressing after docetaxel and anthracycline treatment.
Vassilomanolakis M; Koumakis G; Demiri M; Missitzis J; Barbounis V; Efremidis AP
Cancer Invest; 2003; 21(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 14533438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A rapid and systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the taxanes used in the treatment of advanced breast and ovarian cancer.
Lister-Sharp D; McDonagh MS; Khan KS; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(17):1-113. PubMed ID: 11074389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Docetaxel. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Lamb HM; Wiseman LR
Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Oct; 14(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 10344911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An economic evaluation of docetaxel and paclitaxel regimens in metastatic breast cancer in the UK.
Benedict A; Cameron DA; Corson H; Jones SE
Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(10):847-59. PubMed ID: 19803539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.
Clegg A; Scott DA; Hewitson P; Sidhu M; Waugh N
Thorax; 2002 Jan; 57(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 11809985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Taxanes for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Ward S; Simpson E; Davis S; Hind D; Rees A; Wilkinson A
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(40):1-144. PubMed ID: 17903394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-utility model comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer patients.
Brown RE; Hutton J
Anticancer Drugs; 1998 Nov; 9(10):899-907. PubMed ID: 9890701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Docetaxel vs mitomycin plus vinblastine in anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer.
Nabholtz JM; Thuerlimann B; Bezwoda WR; Melnychuk D; Deschênes L; Douma J; Vandenberg TA; Rapoport B; Rosso R; Trillet-Lenoir V; Drbal J; Aapro MS; Alaki M; Murawsky M; Riva A
Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8 Suppl 8):25-30. PubMed ID: 9364538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reflections on the development of resistance during therapy for advanced breast cancer. Implications of high levels of activity of docetaxel in anthracycline-resistant breast cancer patients.
Ravdin PM
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Aug; 33 Suppl 7():S7-10. PubMed ID: 9486096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biweekly docetaxel and vinorelbine in anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study.
Gómez-Bernal A; Cruz JJ; García-Palomo A; Arizcun A; Pujol E; Diz P; Martín G; Fonseca E; Sánchez P; Rodríguez C; del Barco E; López Y
Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Apr; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 12714881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-utility analysis of taxane therapy.
Yee GC
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1997 Dec; 54(24 Suppl 2):S11-5. PubMed ID: 9435927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical data and pharmacokinetics of a docetaxel-vinorelbine combination in anthracycline resistant/ relapsed metastatic breast cancer.
Airoldi M; Cattel L; Pedani F; Marchionatti S; Tagini V; Bumma C; Recalenda V
Acta Oncol; 2003; 42(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 12852694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Emerging role of taxanes in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the potential and the questions.
Goble S; Bear HD
Surg Clin North Am; 2003 Aug; 83(4):943-71. PubMed ID: 12875604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain.
Frías C; Cortés J; Seguí MÁ; Oyagüez I; Casado MÁ
Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 Oct; 12(10):692-700. PubMed ID: 20947484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
