These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10506887)

  • 1. [Low-dosage dental CT].
    Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Hohn HP; Rustemeyer R; Eich HT; John-Mikolajewski V; Müller RD
    Rofo; 1999 Aug; 171(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10506887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-dose dental computed tomography: significant dose reduction without loss of image quality.
    Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Suttmoeller J
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Dec; 45(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 15690615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose in dental radiology.
    Cohnen M; Kemper J; Möbes O; Pawelzik J; Mödder U
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):634-7. PubMed ID: 11870479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques.
    Cordasco G; Portelli M; Militi A; Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Gatto E; Lucchese A
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():24. PubMed ID: 24325970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dental CT: image quality and radiation exposure in relation to scan parameters].
    Schorn C; Visser H; Hermann KP; Alamo L; Funke M; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 Feb; 170(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10101352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Radiation exposure during spiral-CT of the paranasal sinuses].
    Dammann F; Momino-Traserra E; Remy C; Pereira PL; Baumann I; Koitschev A; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 2000 Mar; 172(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 10778453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT of the sacroiliac joints. Dosimetry and optimal settings for a high-resolution technique.
    Damilakis J; Prassopoulos P; Perisinakis K; Faflia C; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Sep; 38(5):870-5. PubMed ID: 9332247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chau AC; Fung K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose reduction in multi-slice CT of the heart by use of ECG-controlled tube current modulation ("ECG pulsing"): phantom measurements.
    Poll LW; Cohnen M; Brachten S; Ewen K; Mödder U
    Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1500-5. PubMed ID: 12471520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
    Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
    Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-source CT angiography in aortic stent grafting: An in vitro aorta phantom study of image noise and radiation dose.
    Sun Z; Ng C
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):884-93. PubMed ID: 20447840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.