These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10507203)

  • 21. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
    Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of organic peroxide additives on wear resistance of composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Oct; 18(10):1006-8, 1009-11. PubMed ID: 9533310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Confirmation of Leinfelder clinical wear standards.
    Bayne SC; Taylor DF; Rekow ED; Wilder AD; Heymann HO
    Dent Mater; 1994 Jan; 10(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7995469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Occlusal wear of metal-free ceramic-filled polymer crowns after 2 years in service.
    Stober T; Dreyhaupt J; Lehnung U; Rammelsberg P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 18546773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on dentine.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 May; 22(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7616345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
    Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Köhler B; Rasmusson CG; Odman P
    J Dent; 2000 Feb; 28(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 10666968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro quantitative assessment of generalized wear of dental composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():9-18. PubMed ID: 8935089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.