These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10509097)

  • 1. KePRO shoots for excellence times six.
    Oh J
    Pa Med; 1999 Sep; 102(9):13. PubMed ID: 10509097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. KePRO prepares for new national cooperative project.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1995 Nov; 98(11):28. PubMed ID: 7501413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does KePRO compare?
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1992 Jun; 95(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 1614713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uniform clinical data set begins new scope.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1991 Sep; 94(9):38. PubMed ID: 1945446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fourth PRO scope of work.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1993 Feb; 96(2):34. PubMed ID: 8327259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Looking for changes in retroactive HCFA directives.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1992 Dec; 95(12):38. PubMed ID: 1461663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. KePRO's community outreach programs.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1992 Oct; 95(10):46. PubMed ID: 1408257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein.
    Weiser RR
    Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review organizations may increase Inspector General's sanction activity.
    Sax BM
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Sep; 8(18):15-7. PubMed ID: 10300320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A PRO report card.
    Webber AH
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):7-9. PubMed ID: 10301023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perspectives. Peer review of ambulatory care.
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1987 Sep; 41(35):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10301883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disclosure of information to and by peer review organizations.
    Hawthorne KJ
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 10302725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review organizations and skilled nursing facilities.
    Teplitzky SV; Demaree LA
    Healthspan; 1989 Feb; 6(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 10303237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Need help understanding Medicare or Medicaid?
    Pa Health You; 2002; 105(2):12. PubMed ID: 16350776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PRO fund cut seen with alarm.
    Weissenstein E
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Feb; 22(6):44. PubMed ID: 10116213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perspectives. PROs: modification and expansion.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Aug; 39(33):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10300446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cooperative cardiovascular program.
    Charlson J; Collins J; Umbeck M
    QRC Advis; 1995 Jan; 11(3):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 10139748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PRO limited review creates controversy, heavy workload.
    Johnsson J
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Sep; ():34-6. PubMed ID: 10302948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased scrutiny, expanded role ahead for PROs.
    Mowll CA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1989 May; 43(5):16, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10303377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New PRO director seeking advice to improve program.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Oct; 16(22):36-7. PubMed ID: 10301090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.