These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10509939)

  • 1. Risk communication: clinicians' reported approaches and perceived values.
    Heilbrun K; Philipson J; Berman L; Warren J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):397-406. PubMed ID: 10509939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing normative approaches to communicating violence risk: a national survey of psychologists.
    Heilbrun K; O'Neill ML; Stevens TN; Strohman LK; Bowman Q; Lo YW
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15048858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cues they use: clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness.
    Odeh MS; Zeiss RA; Huss MT
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 16557618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making.
    Zoe Hilton N; Carter AM; Harris GT; Sharpe AJ
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Feb; 23(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 18162635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful?
    Carroll A
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 17464716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.
    Brown B; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 25652696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Violent behaviour of patients in institutions].
    Steinert T
    Psychiatr Prax; 2002 Mar; 29(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 11894185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of clinical training on violence risk assessment.
    McNiel DE; Chamberlain JR; Weaver CM; Hall SE; Fordwood SR; Binder RL
    Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 165(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18245189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pilot for a computer-based simulation system for risk estimation and treatment of mentally disordered offenders.
    Wijk L; Edelbring S; Svensson AK; Karlgren K; Kristiansson M; Fors U
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Mar; 34(2):106-15. PubMed ID: 19462270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mental disorder in violent women in secure settings: potential relevance to risk for future violence.
    Logan C; Blackburn R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19081630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing violence risk among youth.
    Borum R
    J Clin Psychol; 2000 Oct; 56(10):1263-88. PubMed ID: 11051059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) in predicting criminal recidivism.
    Kröner C; Stadtland C; Eidt M; Nedopil N
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2007; 17(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17295202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Violence risk assessment and risk communication: the effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats.
    Slovic P; Monahan J; MacGregor DG
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):271-96. PubMed ID: 10846372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship of mental illness to targeted contact behavior toward state government agencies and officials.
    Scalora MJ; Baumgartner JV; Plank GL
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 12645047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving forensic tribunal decisions: the role of the clinician.
    McKee SA; Harris GT; Rice ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):485-506. PubMed ID: 17620273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing and managing violence risk in outpatient settings.
    Otto RK
    J Clin Psychol; 2000 Oct; 56(10):1239-62. PubMed ID: 11051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constant or special observations of inpatients presenting a risk of aggression or violence: nurses' perceptions of the rules of engagement.
    Mackay I; Paterson B; Cassells C
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2005 Aug; 12(4):464-71. PubMed ID: 16011502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the validity of anger regulation problems, interpersonal style, and disturbed mental state for predicting inpatient violence.
    Doyle M; Dolan M
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(6):783-98. PubMed ID: 17171766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The concept of leakage in threat assessment.
    Meloy JR; O'Toole ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):513-27. PubMed ID: 21710573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.