112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10510074)
1. Receptivity of a worksite breast cancer screening education program.
Paskett ED; Masten KB; Phillips KC; Case LD
Health Educ Res; 1999 Oct; 14(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 10510074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer screening education in the workplace.
Paskett ED; Case LD; Masten KB; Phillips KC
J Cancer Educ; 1994; 9(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 7917893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast screening education at Australian and Thai worksites: a comparison of program effectiveness.
Crombie K; Hancock K; Chang E; Vardanega L; Wonghongkul T; Chanakok A; Mahawan S
Contemp Nurse; 2005; 19(1-2):181-96. PubMed ID: 16167447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey.
Linnan L; Bowling M; Childress J; Lindsay G; Blakey C; Pronk S; Wieker S; Royall P
Am J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 98(8):1503-9. PubMed ID: 18048790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Female employee participation in a worksite mammography screening program.
King GE; Davis RL; Baron RC; Horan JM
Am J Prev Med; 1992; 8(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 1419132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening behaviors and long-term compliance with mammography guidelines in a breast cancer screening program.
Weinberg AD; Cooper HP; Lane M; Kripalani S
Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9037339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Work-site cancer screening: a Latino case study.
Gelfand DE; Parzuchowski J; Rivero-Perry M; Shernoff N
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2000 May; 27(4):659-66. PubMed ID: 10833694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program.
Tilley BC; Vernon SW; Myers R; Glanz K; Lu M; Hirst K; Kristal AR
Prev Med; 1999 Mar; 28(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 10072746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Promotion of breast cancer screening in a work site population.
Kurtz ME; Kurtz JC; Given B; Given CC
Health Care Women Int; 1994; 15(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8169167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of Omaha worksite health promotion activities to the 1992 national survey with a special perspective on program intervention.
Eickhoff-Shemek JM; Ryan KF
Am J Health Promot; 1995; 10(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 10160047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationships of barriers and facilitators to breast self-examination, mammography, and clinical breast examination in a worksite population.
Kurtz ME; Given B; Given CW; Kurtz JC
Cancer Nurs; 1993 Aug; 16(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 8402601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary evaluation of an employer-sponsored mammography screening program.
Bodner KM; Bond GG; Phillips PL; Bollinger LJ; Lipps TE; Cook RR
J Occup Med; 1992 Aug; 34(8):793-6. PubMed ID: 1506936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Worksite health promotion in four Midwest cities.
Weisbrod RR; Pirie PL; Bracht NF; Elstun P
J Community Health; 1991 Jun; 16(3):169-77. PubMed ID: 1860969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A breast cancer screening educational intervention targeting medical office staff.
Mahloch J; Taylor V; Taplin S; Urban N
Health Educ Res; 1993 Dec; 8(4):567-79. PubMed ID: 10146564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The association between the presence of occupational health nurses at Japanese worksites and health promotion activities].
Kanamori S; Kai Y; Kawamata K; Kusumoto M; Takamiya T; Ohya Y; Odagiri Y; Fukushima N; Inoue S
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2015; 57(6):297-305. PubMed ID: 26268550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.
Paskett ED; Tatum CM; Mack DW; Hoen H; Case LD; Velez R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Sep; 5(9):721-6. PubMed ID: 8877064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a Multi-Component Workplace Intervention Program with Environmental Changes on Physical Activity among Japanese White-Collar Employees: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Watanabe K; Kawakami N
Int J Behav Med; 2018 Dec; 25(6):637-648. PubMed ID: 30194533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing acceptance of mammography: implications for enhancing worksite cancer control.
Glanz K; Rimer BK; Lerman C; McGovern Gorchov P
Am J Health Promot; 1992; 7(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 10148697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corporate-sponsored breast cancer screening at the work site: results of a statewide program.
Kessler HB; Rimer BK; Devine PJ; Gatenby RA; Engstrom PF
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 2006259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Worksite smoking control activities: prevalence and related worksite characteristics from the COMMIT Study, 1990.
Glasgow RE; Sorensen G; Corbett K
Prev Med; 1992 Nov; 21(6):688-700. PubMed ID: 1438115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
