218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10511531)
1. Human and animal epidemic of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9, 1989-1997, Auvergne, France.
Gourdon F; Beytout J; Reynaud A; Romaszko JP; Perre D; Theodore P; Soubelet H; Sirot J
Emerg Infect Dis; 1999; 5(5):719-21. PubMed ID: 10511531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Yersinia enterocolitica: an unlikely cause of positive brucellosis tests in greater yellowstone ecosystem bison (Bison bison).
See W; Edwards WH; Dauwalter S; Almendra C; Kardos MD; Lowell JL; Wallen R; Cain SL; Holben WE; Luikart G
J Wildl Dis; 2012 Jul; 48(3):537-41. PubMed ID: 22740518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Serological cross-reactions between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR; Barnum DA
Int J Zoonoses; 1985 Sep; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 2422134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.
Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Ross GP; Joyce MA; Fenwick S; Heesemann J; Wolf-Watz H; Nielsen K
Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 8748542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.
Nielsen K; Smith P; Widdison J; Gall D; Kelly L; Kelly W; Nicoletti P
Vet Microbiol; 2004 May; 100(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 15135510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 09 infections: use of lymphocyte transformation test.
Chukwu CC
Int J Zoonoses; 1985 Jun; 12(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 3935592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple technique to differentiate between animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica IX and those infected with Brucella abortus.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR
Res Vet Sci; 1979 Mar; 26(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 122268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9. III. Specificity of the in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon test for bovine brucellosis diagnosis in experimentally Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9-infected cattle.
Kittelberger R; Reichel MP; Joyce MA; Staak C
Vet Microbiol; 1997 Oct; 57(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 9444073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contribution to the differentiation of cross-reacting antibodies in brucellosis serology--1. Reactions with various Yersinia serotypes and antibody avidity].
Staak C; Draeger A; Bahn P; Nöckler K
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2000 Oct; 113(10):361-7. PubMed ID: 11084752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Incidence of antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica in swine sera in relation to the serological differentiation of Brucella infections].
Schmittdiel E; von Wangenheim B; Chorherr S
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 98(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3985937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Infection of cattle with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests.
Weynants V; Tibor A; Denoel PA; Saegerman C; Godfroid J; Thiange P; Letesson JJ
Vet Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 48(1-2):101-12. PubMed ID: 8701566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.
Kittelberger R; Bundesen PG; Cloeckaert A; Greiser-Wilke I; Letesson JJ
Vet Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 60(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 9595626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Serologic response of pigs to experimental infection with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O9 and Brucella abortus.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR
Am J Vet Res; 1981 Mar; 42(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 6791534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The antigenic relationship between Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:3 and 0:9].
Kocabeyoğlu O
Mikrobiyol Bul; 1990 Jul; 24(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 1704479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Studies on the relationship between Yersinia enterocolitica IX and Brucella abortus agglutinins in naturally infected animals.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR
Res Vet Sci; 1980 May; 28(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 6774395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Enzyme immunoassay to demonstrate antibodies against Brucella abortus in the sera of cattle].
Herrmann H; Dedek J
Arch Exp Veterinarmed; 1982; 36(6):871-80. PubMed ID: 6820266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 09 infections in cattle: the use of specific lymphocyte transformation and brucellin skin tests.
Chukwu CC
Vet Q; 1987 Apr; 9(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 3113038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 I immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosis.
Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Penrose M; de Lisle GW; Letesson JJ; Garin-Bastuji B; Searson J; Fossati CA; Cloeckaert A
Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):257-70. PubMed ID: 8748541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
Riber U; Jungersen G
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
