218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10511531)
21. [An identification of special antibodies for brucellosis].
Lu DW
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Jun; 10(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 2505930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Possibility of the serological differential diagnosis of human brucellosis and yersiniasis].
Zheludkov MM; Dunaev VI
Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1983 Jan; (1):42-5. PubMed ID: 6404076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in a field trial.
Gerbier G; Garin-Bastuji B; Pouillot R; Véry P; Cau C; Berr V; Dufour B; Moutou F
Vet Res; 1997; 28(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 9257445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new homogeneous assay for high throughput serological diagnosis of brucellosis in ruminants.
McGiven JA; Sawyer J; Perrett LL; Brew SD; Commander NJ; Fisher A; McLarnon S; Harper K; Stack JA
J Immunol Methods; 2008 Aug; 337(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 18579152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of a western blotting assay to discriminate Brucella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 infections in sheep.
Corrente M; Desario C; Greco G; Buonavoglia D; Pratelli A; Madio A; Scaltrito D; Consenti B; Buonavoglia C
New Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15164626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in the faeces of cattle with false positive reactions in serological tests for brucellosis in Ireland.
O'Grady D; Kenny K; Power S; Egan J; Ryan F
Vet J; 2016 Oct; 216():133-5. PubMed ID: 27687940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An evaluation of ELISA using recombinant Brucella abortus bacterioferritin (Bfr) for bovine brucellosis.
Hop HT; Arayan LT; Simborio HL; Reyes AW; Min W; Lee HJ; Lee JJ; Chang HH; Kim S
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Apr; 45():16-9. PubMed ID: 27012915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Garin-Bastuji B; Hummel N; Gerbier G; Cau C; Pouillot R; Da Costa M; Fontaine JJ
Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Experimental studies on the serological relationships between Yersinia enterocolitica and Brucella abortus.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR
Res Vet Sci; 1979 Nov; 27(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 120574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of interferon-gamma producing cells during infections by Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Brucella abortus in cattle.
Agnone A; La Manna MP; Vesco G; Gargano V; Macaluso G; Dieli F; Sireci G; Villari S
Vet Ital; 2019 Jun; 55(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 31274176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9.
Erdenebaatar J; Bayarsaikhan B; Watarai M; Makino S; Shirahata T
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2003 Jul; 10(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 12853409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Indirect hemagglutination employing enterobacterial common antigen and Yersinia somatic antigen: a technique to differentiate brucellosis from infections involving cross-reacting Yersinia enterocolitica.
Mittal KR; Ricciardi ID; Tizard IR
J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Feb; 11(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 6766951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Use of an in vitro allergy test for the differential diagnosis of human brucellosis and yersiniosis].
Zheludkov MM; Chernysheva MI
Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1985 Feb; (2):92-5. PubMed ID: 3922184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Immunogenic proteins of Brucella abortus to minimize cross reactions in brucellosis diagnosis.
Ko KY; Kim JW; Her M; Kang SI; Jung SC; Cho DH; Kim JY
Vet Microbiol; 2012 May; 156(3-4):374-80. PubMed ID: 22192360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Studies on the polysaccharide B and native haptene of Brucella and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 9.
Diaz R; Toyos J; Salvo MD; Fernandez-Lago L; Alonso B; Moriyon I; Dorronsoro I
Dev Biol Stand; 1984; 56():213-20. PubMed ID: 6436095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The background of the serological cross-reaction between Yersinia and Brucella and the possibility of differential diagnostics by the ELISA technique and the electroimmuno assay (rocket electrophoresis) (author's transl)].
Hurvell B
Nord Vet Med; 1978; 30(7-8):305-17. PubMed ID: 693273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Observations on serological cross-reactions between smooth Brucella species and organisms of other genera.
Corbel MJ; Stuart FA; Brewer RA
Dev Biol Stand; 1984; 56():341-8. PubMed ID: 6489620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cross-reactivity in serological tests for brucellosis: a comparison of immune response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 vs Brucella spp.
Bonfini B; Chiarenza G; Paci V; Sacchini F; Salini R; Vesco G; Villari S; Zilli K; Tittarelli M
Vet Ital; 2018 Jun; 54(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 30019327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.
Jungersen G; Sørensen V; Giese SB; Stack JA; Riber U
Epidemiol Infect; 2006 Apr; 134(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 16490140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Seroprevalence of brucellosis, tularemia, and yersiniosis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from north-eastern Germany.
Al Dahouk S; Nöckler K; Tomaso H; Splettstoesser WD; Jungersen G; Riber U; Petry T; Hoffmann D; Scholz HC; Hensel A; Neubauer H
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2005 Dec; 52(10):444-55. PubMed ID: 16364020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
