These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10511630)

  • 1. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). I. Basic findings in rabbits.
    Martin GK; Stagner BB; Jassir D; Telischi FF; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):105-23. PubMed ID: 10511630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.
    Martin GK; Villasuso EI; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2003 Mar; 177(1-2):111-22. PubMed ID: 12618323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human efferent adaptation of DPOAEs in the L1,L2 space.
    Meinke DK; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 208(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 16019174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):972-83. PubMed ID: 9714917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.
    Luebke AE; Foster PK; Stagner BB
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Mar; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 12083721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generation of DPOAEs in the guinea pig.
    Withnell RH; Shaffer LA; Talmadge CL
    Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 178(1-2):106-17. PubMed ID: 12684183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on distortion-product and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl.
    Manley GA; Taschenberger G; Oeckinghaus H
    Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 138(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 10575110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amplitude of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig in f(1)- and f(2)-sweep paradigms.
    Schneider S; Schoonhoven R; Prijs VF
    Hear Res; 2001 May; 155(1-2):21-31. PubMed ID: 11335073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the wave-fixed and place-fixed origins of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission within a micromechanical cochlear model.
    Young JA; Elliott SJ; Lineton B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4699-709. PubMed ID: 22712943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for multiple DPOAE components based upon group delay of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion in the gerbil.
    Faulstich M; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 140(1-2):99-110. PubMed ID: 10675638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Deeter R; Abel R; Calandruccio L; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2413-24. PubMed ID: 19894823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
    Sun XM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
    Vetesník A; Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions to Intracochlear Distortion Products Inferred from a Noninvasive Assay.
    Martin GK; Stagner BB; Dong W; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):271-87. PubMed ID: 27229002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the anuran ear.
    Meenderink SW; Narins PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):344-51. PubMed ID: 17297789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Kummer P; Janssen T; Arnold W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 7608400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.