These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Distortion-product emissions in rabbit: II. Prediction of chronic-noise effects by brief pure-tone exposures. Mensh BD; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8276733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in 28 inbred strains of mice. Martin GK; Vazquez AE; Jimenez AM; Stagner BB; Howard MA; Lonsbury-Martin BL Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 234(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 17997239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion product in cochlear microphonics and otoacoustic emissions]. Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Makishima K Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1997 Aug; 100(8):839-45. PubMed ID: 9293764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in normal and noise-exposed rabbits. Porter CA; Martin GK; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):884-900. PubMed ID: 16938977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distortion-product emissions in rabbit: I. Altered susceptibility to repeated pure-tone exposures. Mensh BD; Patterson MC; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 8276732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans. Müller J; Janssen T; Heppelmann G; Wagner W J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec; 118(6):3747-56. PubMed ID: 16419819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli. Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluating cochlear function and the effects of noise exposure in the B6.CAST+Ahl mouse with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Vázquez AE; Jimenez AM; Martin GK; Luebke AE; Lonsbury-Martin BL Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15276680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear. Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms. Wagner W; Heyd A Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emission phase is attributed to component mixing. Abdala C; Dhar S; Kalluri R J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3123-33. PubMed ID: 21568415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils. Mills DM J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control. Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]