These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10511666)

  • 1. Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements.
    Kusnoto B; Evans CA; BeGole EA; de Rijk W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 10511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method.
    Olmez H; Gorgulu S; Akin E; Bengi AO; Tekdemir I; Ors F
    Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21261485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs.
    Malkoc S; Sari Z; Usumez S; Koyuturk AE
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 15947234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography.
    Tsang KH; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10191573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric assessment of effect of head rotation toward focal spot on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Naresh V; Lokesh NK; Pratapvarma KV; Srikrishna C; Chakravarthy VG; Shamnur N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 23811646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved lateral cephalometric superimposition using an automated image fitting technique.
    Larson BE; Sievers MM; Ko CC
    Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):474-9. PubMed ID: 20050739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Image Distortion from Head Rotation in Lateral Cephalometry.
    Gaddam R; Shashikumar HC; Lokesh NK; Suma T; Arya S; Shwetha GS
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 7(6):35-40. PubMed ID: 26124597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
    Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
    Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance.
    Rakhshan V; Rakhshan H; Sheibaninia A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 20108870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.