These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Liu JK; Chen YT; Cheng KS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 11094367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. Kamoen A; Dermaut L; Verbeeck R Eur J Orthod; 2001 Oct; 23(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 11668876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An accurate three-dimensional cephalometric system: a solution for the correction of cephalic malpositioning. Mori Y; Miyajima T; Minami K; Sakuda M J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 28(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 11395529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Combined effects of errors in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis. Pirttiniemi P; Miettinen J; Kantomaa T Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 9009427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Yoon YJ; Kim KS; Hwang MS; Kim HJ; Choi EH; Kim KW Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):396-403. PubMed ID: 11605875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses. Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reproducibility of linear and angular cephalometric measurements obtained by an artificial-intelligence assisted software (WebCeph) in comparison with digital software (AutoCEPH) and manual tracing method. Prince STT; Srinivasan D; Duraisamy S; Kannan R; Rajaram K Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(1):e2321214. PubMed ID: 37018830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data. Codari M; Caffini M; Tartaglia GM; Sforza C; Baselli G Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 27358080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of head rotation on two-dimensional cephalometric measurements using cone beam-computed tomography. El Hayeck E; Bassil-Nassif N; Khairallah A; El Wak T; Bouserhal J Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2747-2761. PubMed ID: 36631596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs. Greiner M; Greiner A; Hirschfelder U J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jul; 68(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 17639277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms. Shokri A; Miresmaeili A; Farhadian N; Falah-Kooshki S; Amini P; Mollaie N Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160180. PubMed ID: 28306330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements. Jodeh DS; Kuykendall LV; Ford JM; Ruso S; Decker SJ; Rottgers SA J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1568-1571. PubMed ID: 31299770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence. Bao H; Zhang K; Yu C; Li H; Cao D; Shu H; Liu L; Yan B BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):191. PubMed ID: 37005593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms. Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro. Olszewski R; Zech F; Cosnard G; Nicolas V; Macq B; Reychler H Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 36(9):828-33. PubMed ID: 17825530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans. Na ER; Aljawad H; Lee KM; Hwang HS Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30603624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality. Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]