550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10511769)
1. Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial.
Lertakyamanee J; Chinachoti T; Tritrakarn T; Muangkasem J; Somboonnanonda A; Kolatat T
J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Jul; 82(7):672-80. PubMed ID: 10511769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the maternal and neonatal effects of epidural block and of combined spinal-epidural block for Cesarean section.
Karaman S; Akercan F; Akarsu T; Firat V; Ozcan O; Karadadas N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 15989982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of general and regional anesthesia on the neonate (a prospective, randomized trial).
Kolatat T; Somboonnanonda A; Lertakyamanee J; Chinachot T; Tritrakarn T; Muangkasem J
J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Jan; 82(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 10087737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal satisfaction to epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
Sindhvananda W; Leelanukrom R; Rodanant O; Sriprajittichai P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Jun; 87(6):628-35. PubMed ID: 15279340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of neonatal effects of epidural and general anesthesia for cesarean section.
Sener EB; Guldogus F; Karakaya D; Baris S; Kocamanoglu S; Tur A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2003; 55(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12624551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.
Horstman DJ; Riley ET; Carvalho B
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):240-5. PubMed ID: 19095857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison among 3 techniques of spinal and epidural anesthesia for caesarean section.
Panich A
J Med Assoc Thai; 1990 Nov; 73(11):603-9. PubMed ID: 2283488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural and epidural volume extension for elective caesarean section: a randomized comparison.
Tyagi A; Girotra G; Kumar A; Kumar S; Sethi AK; Mohta M
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2009 Jul; 18(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19447598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized trial comparing the technique of spinal and general anesthesia for lumbar disk surgery: a study of 100 cases.
Sadrolsadat SH; Mahdavi AR; Moharari RS; Khajavi MR; Khashayar P; Najafi A; Amirjamshidi A
Surg Neurol; 2009 Jan; 71(1):60-5; discussion 65. PubMed ID: 19084683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Anesthetic management for elective cesarean section due to placenta previa in a patient with moyamoya disease].
Nagashima M; Nagashima K; Endo A; Takahata O; Sengoku K; Iwasaki H
Masui; 2002 Dec; 51(12):1349-51. PubMed ID: 12607271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients.
Ithnin F; Lim Y; Sia AT; Ocampo CE
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):577-80. PubMed ID: 16428564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Similar onset time of 2-chloroprocaine and lidocaine + epinephrine for epidural anesthesia for elective Cesarean section.
Bjørnestad E; Iversen OL; Raeder J
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Mar; 50(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 16480471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mother and child stress parameters during cesarean section with general and peridural anesthesia].
Adams HA; Biscoping J; Baumann P; Börgmann A; Hempelmann G
Reg Anaesth; 1989 Sep; 12(5):87-94. PubMed ID: 2554373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Experience with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia at cesarean section].
Levinzon AS; Taran OI; Pura KR; Mishchenko GS; Mamaeva NV
Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2006; (4):57-9. PubMed ID: 17061588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of sequential combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
Brizzi A; Greco F; Malvasi A; Valerio A; Martino V
Minerva Anestesiol; 2005 Nov; 71(11):701-9. PubMed ID: 16278629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section.
Morgan PJ; Halpern S; Lam-McCulloch J
Can J Anaesth; 2000 Oct; 47(10):956-61. PubMed ID: 11032269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of type of anesthesia on blood loss at elective repeat cesarean section.
Andrews WW; Ramin SM; Maberry MC; Shearer V; Black S; Wallace DH
Am J Perinatol; 1992 May; 9(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 1575842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined spinal epidural does not cause a higher sensory block than single shot spinal technique for cesarean delivery in laboring women.
Lim Y; Teoh W; Sia AT
Anesth Analg; 2006 Dec; 103(6):1540-2. PubMed ID: 17122236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypotension in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5% hyperbaric lidocaine.
Kyokong O; Charuluxananan S; Pothimamaka S; Leerapun R
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S256-62. PubMed ID: 11529341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Spinal analgesia for cesarean section].
Kristensen BB; Nielsen JM; Jensen BO; Sonnenschein CH
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Sep; 155(36):2807-10. PubMed ID: 8236551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
