BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10513024)

  • 1. Further analysis of problem behavior in response class hierarchies.
    Richman DM; Wacker DP; Asmus JM; Casey SD; Andelman M
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):269-83. PubMed ID: 10513024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of response class hierarchies with attention-maintained problem behaviors.
    Harding JW; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Barretto A; Winborn L; Gardner A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11317988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Carr JE; Severtson JM; Lepper TL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 18467073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of presession attention on problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers.
    McComas JJ; Thompson A; Johnson L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 14596571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction.
    Athens ES; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(4):569-89. PubMed ID: 21541145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clarifying inconclusive functional analysis results: Assessment and treatment of automatically reinforced aggression.
    Saini V; Greer BD; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):315-30. PubMed ID: 25891269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal assessment of stereotypic, proto-injurious, and self-injurious behavior exhibited by young children with developmental delays.
    Richman DM; Lindauer SE
    Am J Ment Retard; 2005 Nov; 110(6):439-50. PubMed ID: 16212447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinforcement magnitude and responding during treatment with differential reinforcement.
    Lerman DC; Kelley ME; Vorndran CM; Kuhn SA; LaRue RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11936544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Teacher use of descriptive analysis data to implement interventions to decrease students' problem behaviors.
    Lalli JS; Browder DM; Mace FC; Brown DK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 8331019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and evaluation of response redirection as a treatment for challenging behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Lydon S; Healy O; O'Reilly M; McCoy A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Oct; 34(10):3148-58. PubMed ID: 23886757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the reinforcing effects of the content of verbal attention.
    Fisher WW; Ninness HA; Piazza CC; Owen-DeSchryver JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 8682738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing main and collateral effects of extinction and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.
    Petscher ES; Bailey JS
    Behav Modif; 2008 Jul; 32(4):468-88. PubMed ID: 18525062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advances in the indirect, descriptive, and experimental approaches to the functional analysis of problem behavior.
    Wightman J; Julio F; Virués-Ortega J
    Psicothema; 2014 May; 26(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 24755019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior.
    Marsteller TM; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 24844682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additional free reinforcers increase persistence of problem behavior in a clinical context: A partial replication of laboratory findings.
    Lieving GA; DeLeon IG; Carreau-Webster AB; Frank-Crawford MA; Triggs MM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):253-264. PubMed ID: 29380436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the types of attention that maintain problem behavior.
    Kodak T; Northup J; Kelley ME
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 17471800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An application of the matching law to severe problem behavior.
    Borrero JC; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 11936543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the relative contributions of positive reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.
    Piazza CC; Patel MR; Gulotta CS; Sevin BM; Layer SA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):309-24. PubMed ID: 14596572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.