These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10513273)
1. Moon over Surrey. Walter A CMAJ; 1999 Sep; 161(6):688. PubMed ID: 10513273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Taking a closer look at the rectal examination: beyond the basics. Deshpande AR; Block N; Barkin JS Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jan; 104(1):246-7; author reply 247. PubMed ID: 19098881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The digital rectal exam: still useful after all these years? Harv Mens Health Watch; 2002 Aug; 7(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 12217820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Low prostate specific antigen levels and normal digital rectal examination--a report on a follow up cohort in general practice. Brett T Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Apr; 34(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 15861761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Physical diagnosis--digital rectal examination]. van Driel MF; van Andel MV; ten Cate Hoedemaker HO; Wolf RF; Mensink HJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Mar; 146(11):508-12. PubMed ID: 11925800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendations and rationale. Berg AO; Am J Nurs; 2003 Mar; 103(3):107-10; discussion 111. PubMed ID: 12626949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Underutilization of digital rectal examination when screening for prostate cancer. Murthy GD; Byron DP; Pasquale D Arch Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 164(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 14769627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in detecting carcinoma prostate. Iqbal N; Bhatti AN; Husain S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jun; 13(6):340-2. PubMed ID: 12814533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rectal examination in general practice. Kemple T BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):667-8. PubMed ID: 2224227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for cancer: testicular and prostate cancer. Harv Mens Health Watch; 2005 Nov; 10(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 16365955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [What is the value of digital rectal examination?]. Lebiedz P; Kucharzik T Med Klin (Munich); 2004 Dec; 99(12):735-9; quiz 740-1. PubMed ID: 15599684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Screening of the prostate cancer. "lnstantaneous" of a daily practice among 300 general practitioners of the canton of Vaud]. Praz V; Jichlinski P; Aymon D; Leisinger HJ Rev Med Suisse; 2005 Dec; 1(44):2840-2. PubMed ID: 16382715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing the diagnosis of prostate cancer in high-risk men: the supplementary biomarker approach. Kommu S; Persad R; Watkin N; Boyd PJ; Eeles R BJU Int; 2005 Jan; 95(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 15638884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genital and dermatologic examination. Part II: The male patient. Albaugh JA; Kellogg-Spadt S Urol Nurs; 2003 Oct; 23(5):366-7. PubMed ID: 14621360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Uncommon initial symptoms of metastasized carcinoma of the prostate]. Wymenga LF; Mensink HJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Oct; 143(42):2081-6. PubMed ID: 10560555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Couch or crouch? Examining the prostate: a randomized study comparing the knee-elbow and the left-lateral position. Schellhammer PF BJU Int; 2001 Oct; 88(6):645. PubMed ID: 11678769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening by prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in relation to prostate cancer mortality. A case-control study. Walsh PC J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1824-5. PubMed ID: 16217296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Generalized lymphadenopathy: physical examination revisited. Garg PK; Jain BK; Dubey IB; Sharma AK Ann Saudi Med; 2013; 33(3):298-300. PubMed ID: 22750769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]