241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10513756)
1. Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis.
Steyerberg EW; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD
J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 52(10):935-42. PubMed ID: 10513756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets.
Steyerberg EW; Eijkemans MJ; Harrell FE; Habbema JD
Stat Med; 2000 Apr; 19(8):1059-79. PubMed ID: 10790680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated variable selection methods for logistic regression produced unstable models for predicting acute myocardial infarction mortality.
Austin PC; Tu JV
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1138-46. PubMed ID: 15567629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data.
Wynants L; Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Moerbeek M; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1406-14. PubMed ID: 25817942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis.
Steyerberg EW; Harrell FE; Borsboom GJ; Eijkemans MJ; Vergouwe Y; Habbema JD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Aug; 54(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 11470385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic modeling with logistic regression analysis: in search of a sensible strategy in small data sets.
Steyerberg EW; Eijkemans MJ; Harrell FE; Habbema JD
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 11206946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 27881078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.
Peduzzi P; Concato J; Kemper E; Holford TR; Feinstein AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 49(12):1373-9. PubMed ID: 8970487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure.
Courvoisier DS; Combescure C; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 21411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable.
Ogundimu EO; Altman DG; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():175-82. PubMed ID: 26964707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing bias in parameter estimates from stepwise regression in proportional hazards regression with right-censored data.
Soh CH; Harrington DP; Zaslavsky AM
Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Mar; 14(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 18189162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of stepwise covariate model building strategies in population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis.
Wählby U; Jonsson EN; Karlsson MO
AAPS PharmSci; 2002; 4(4):E27. PubMed ID: 12645999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The exclusion of women from clinical trials of thrombolytic therapy: implications for developing the thrombolytic predictive instrument database.
Maynard C; Selker HP; Beshansky JR; Griffith JL; Schmid CH; Califf RM; D'Agostino RB; Laks MM; Lee KL; Wagner GS
Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 7898296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage.
Steyerberg EW; Borsboom GJ; van Houwelingen HC; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD
Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(16):2567-86. PubMed ID: 15287085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Equally valid models gave divergent predictions for mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients in a comparison of logistic [corrected] regression models.
Steyerberg EW; Eijkemans MJ; Boersma E; Habbema JD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 15862724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3286-300. PubMed ID: 17940997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. GUSTO-I Investigators.
Lee KL; Woodlief LH; Topol EJ; Weaver WD; Betriu A; Col J; Simoons M; Aylward P; Van de Werf F; Califf RM
Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1659-68. PubMed ID: 7882472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An independently derived and validated predictive model for selecting patients with myocardial infarction who are likely to benefit from tissue plasminogen activator compared with streptokinase.
Kent DM; Hayward RA; Griffith JL; Vijan S; Beshansky JR; Califf RM; Selker HP
Am J Med; 2002 Aug; 113(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 12133748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.
van Smeden M; Moons KG; de Groot JA; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2455-2474. PubMed ID: 29966490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
