246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10513756)
21. Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multivariable clinical prediction models.
Iba K; Shinozaki T; Maruo K; Noma H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 33413132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
Dreiseitl S; Ohno-Machado L; Vinterbo S
Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():246-50. PubMed ID: 10566358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data.
Weiss ES; Chang DD; Joyce DL; Nwakanma LU; Yuh DD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):503-11, 511.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18329460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bootstrap model selection had similar performance for selecting authentic and noise variables compared to backward variable elimination: a simulation study.
Austin PC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1009-17.e1. PubMed ID: 18539429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates.
Peduzzi P; Concato J; Feinstein AR; Holford TR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 48(12):1503-10. PubMed ID: 8543964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of using multiple stepwise algorithms for variable selection.
Wiegand RE
Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1647-59. PubMed ID: 20552568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prognostic Value of Estimated Plasma Volume in Heart Failure.
Duarte K; Monnez JM; Albuisson E; Pitt B; Zannad F; Rossignol P
JACC Heart Fail; 2015 Nov; 3(11):886-93. PubMed ID: 26541787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of regional cardiovascular mortality on the use of angiography after acute myocardial infarction.
McCullough PA; O'Neill WW
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Mar; 79(5):575-80. PubMed ID: 9068511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Selection bias in the use of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. The SAVE Investigators.
Pfeffer MA; Moyé LA; Braunwald E; Basta L; Brown EJ; Cuddy TE; Dagenais GR; Flaker GO; Geltman EM; Gersh BJ
JAMA; 1991 Jul 24-31; 266(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 2061979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: predictors of death. GUSTO Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue-Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries.
Hasdai D; Holmes DR; Califf RM; Thompson TD; Hochman JS; Pfisterer M; Topol EJ
Am Heart J; 1999 Jul; 138(1 Pt 1):21-31. PubMed ID: 10385759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Bayesian model averaging and stepwise methods for model selection in logistic regression.
Wang D; Zhang W; Bakhai A
Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(22):3451-67. PubMed ID: 15505893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A genetic algorithm to select variables in logistic regression: example in the domain of myocardial infarction.
Vinterbo S; Ohno-Machado L
Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():984-8. PubMed ID: 10566508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.
Stukel TA; Fisher ES; Wennberg DE; Alter DA; Gottlieb DJ; Vermeulen MJ
JAMA; 2007 Jan; 297(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 17227979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Psychosocial predictors of mortality in 83 women with premature acute myocardial infarction.
Powell LH; Shaker LA; Jones BA; Vaccarino LV; Thoresen CE; Pattillo JR
Psychosom Med; 1993; 55(5):426-33. PubMed ID: 8265744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predicting hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Funk M; Pooley-Richards RL
Am J Crit Care; 1994 May; 3(3):168-76. PubMed ID: 8038844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of circulating levels of endothelin-1 in patients after acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty.
Yip HK; Wu CJ; Chang HW; Yang CH; Yu TH; Chen YH; Hang CL
Chest; 2005 May; 127(5):1491-7. PubMed ID: 15888819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The number of primary events per variable affects estimation of the subdistribution hazard competing risks model.
Austin PC; Allignol A; Fine JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():75-84. PubMed ID: 28088594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical predictors of 30-day cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome at a community hospital.
Tadros GM; McConnell TR; Wood GC; Costello JM; Iliadis EA
South Med J; 2003 Nov; 96(11):1113-20. PubMed ID: 14632360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Growth-differentiation factor 15 and osteoprotegerin in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a biomarker substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.
Fuernau G; Poenisch C; Eitel I; de Waha S; Desch S; Schuler G; Adams V; Werdan K; Zeymer U; Thiele H
Eur J Heart Fail; 2014 Aug; 16(8):880-7. PubMed ID: 24903195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of prognostic clinical and ECG parameters in patients after myocardial infarction by applying logistic regression method.
Urbonaviciene G; Urbonavicius S; Vorum H; Bluzaite I; Jarusevicius G; Honoré B; Tamosiunaite M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1391-8. PubMed ID: 18950295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
