These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10513757)

  • 21. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
    Reust CE
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Errors in the use of the Pap smear.
    Hughes RR
    South Med J; 1972 May; 65(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 5027464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
    Linder J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Should we abandon pap smear testing?
    DeMay RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S48-51. PubMed ID: 11996169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predictive value of the abnormal PAP smear: a retrospective analysis of error rates.
    Kwikkel HJ; Quaak MJ; de With C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1986 Feb; 21(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 3956830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Papanicolaou smear: an insensitive case-finding procedure.
    Shulman JJ; Leyton M; Hamilton R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Oct; 120(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 4416606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The false-negative fraction for Papanicolaou smears: how often are "abnormal" smears not detected by a "standard" screening cytologist?
    Naryshkin S
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):270-2. PubMed ID: 9111116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pap smears and screening for cervical neoplasia.
    Wilkinson EJ
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 33(4):817-25. PubMed ID: 2289348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Follow-up of unsatisfactory Papanicolaou test results.
    McGaraghan A; Smith-McCune K
    JAMA; 2000 Mar; 283(10):1290-1. PubMed ID: 10714724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Cervical pap smears: techniques and clinical significance].
    Lambert C
    Rev Med Liege; 1999 Apr; 54(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 10389474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. A study of 34 cases.
    Lee KR; Minter LJ; Granter SR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jan; 107(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 8980364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interobserver variability in assessing adequacy of the squamous component in conventional cervicovaginal smears.
    Sheffield MV; Simsir A; Talley L; Roberson AJ; Elgert PA; Chhieng DC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Mar; 119(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 12645338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Blinded review of Papanicolaou smears in the context of litigation.
    Renshaw AA; Young ML; Holladay EB
    Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 15211471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consistency of cytology diagnosis for cervical cancer between two laboratories.
    Sriamporn S; Kritpetcharat O; Nieminen P; Suwanrungraung K; Kamsa-ard S; Parkin DM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 16101335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor.
    Hutchinson ML; Isenstein LM; Goodman A; Hurley AA; Douglass KL; Mui KK; Patten FW; Zahniser DJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 8116578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.