127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10514634)
1. Glass capillary tubes: safety advisory.
Jeffress CN; Rosenstock L; Burlington DB
Int J Trauma Nurs; 1999; 5(3):83. PubMed ID: 10514634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. FDA, NIOSH, and OSHA recommend blunt-tip suture needles to reduce needlesticks.
Health Devices; 2012 Aug; 41(8):267. PubMed ID: 23444705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Arterial blood gas syringe safety device: does it present a greater hazard?
Jain S; Weinbren M; Rowley J; Bradley A
J Hosp Infect; 2004 Jul; 57(3):264-5. PubMed ID: 15236858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Safer devices help avoid needlestick accidents.
Schuman AJ
Contemp Urol; 1992 Oct; 4(10):61-6. PubMed ID: 10147899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Notes from the National Conference on Prevention of Device-mediated Bloodborne Infections.
Alpert LI
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Nov; 24(11):43-4, 46. PubMed ID: 10183745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Curbing needlestick injuries. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
J Healthc Prot Manage; 1998-1999 Winter; 15(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 10346265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Administering smallpox vaccine: a two-pronged risk.
Perry J; Jagger J
Nursing; 2004 Jan; 34(1):30. PubMed ID: 14738067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. NIOSH urges use of safer devices.
OR Manager; 2000 Jan; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 10787733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk warning. Broken glass capillary tubes pose danger from bloodborne pathogens.
Neonatal Netw; 2000 Feb; 19(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 11949553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Have we seen the last of sharp retractor use in surgical, emergent, or trauma procedures?
O'Saben K
J Trauma Nurs; 2007; 14(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 17420654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Plastic collection tubes decrease risk of employee injury.
Ernst DJ
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):44-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 11373814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Needlestick-prevention devices.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1998 Nov; 12(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 10345772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Act sharpens needlestick provisions.
Burgess KL; Riley P
Provider; 2001 Feb; 27(2):37-8. PubMed ID: 11225078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. CDC, OSHA push for changes to reduce needle-stick injuries.
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2000 Jan; 57(1):14, 19-20. PubMed ID: 10630551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lancets as a source of sharps injuries.
Weinbren MJ; Hardwick A; Perinpanayagam RM; Thayalan AS
J Hosp Infect; 1998 Mar; 38(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 9561476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Improper use of needlestick-prevention device leads to Cal/OSHA citation.
Health Devices; 2001 Aug; 30(8):315. PubMed ID: 11544781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Additions to the OSHA bloodborne pathogens standard.
Miller CH
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):186. PubMed ID: 11572298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HIV risks remain, as needle safety goal fades. National surveillance of injuries still lacking.
AIDS Alert; 2010 Dec; 25(12):137-9. PubMed ID: 21328811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Collecting umbilical cord blood.
Perry J; Jagger J
Nursing; 2004 Oct; 34(10):20. PubMed ID: 15489606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Two new weapons released in battle against needlesticks.
Nawar M
Am Nurse; 2000; 32(1):23. PubMed ID: 10876424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
