These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10515010)

  • 1. The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading.
    Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(18):1873-81. PubMed ID: 10515010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent advances in analytical modeling of lumbar disc degeneration.
    Natarajan RN; Williams JR; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(23):2733-41. PubMed ID: 15564922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-specific spine models. Part 1: Finite element analysis of the lumbar intervertebral disc--a material sensitivity study.
    Fagan MJ; Julian S; Siddall DJ; Mohsen AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(5):299-314. PubMed ID: 12365788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can variations in intervertebral disc height affect the mechanical function of the disc?
    Lu YM; Hutton WC; Gharpuray VM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Oct; 21(19):2208-16; discussion 2217. PubMed ID: 8902964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical responses of the intervertebral joints to static and vibrational loading: a finite element study.
    Cheung JT; Zhang M; Chow DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Nov; 18(9):790-9. PubMed ID: 14527805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational study of the role of fluid content and flow on the lumbar disc response in cyclic compression: Replication of in vitro and in vivo conditions.
    Velísková P; Bashkuev M; Shirazi-Adl A; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():16-25. PubMed ID: 29132725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element based nonlinear normalization of human lumbar intervertebral disc stiffness to account for its morphology.
    Maquer G; Laurent M; Brandejsky V; Pretterklieber ML; Zysset PK
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Jun; 136(6):061003. PubMed ID: 24671515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
    Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
    Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact response of the intervertebral disc in a finite-element model.
    Lee CK; Kim YE; Lee CS; Hong YM; Jung JM; Goel VK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Oct; 25(19):2431-9. PubMed ID: 11013493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multibody modelling approach to determine load sharing between passive elements of the lumbar spine.
    Abouhossein A; Weisse B; Ferguson SJ
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Jun; 14(6):527-37. PubMed ID: 21128134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osmoviscoelastic finite element model of the intervertebral disc.
    Schroeder Y; Wilson W; Huyghe JM; Baaijens FP
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S361-71. PubMed ID: 16724211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geometric determinants of the mechanical behavior of image-based finite element models of the intervertebral disc.
    Fleps I; Newman HR; Elliott DM; Morgan EF
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Jun; 42(6):1343-1355. PubMed ID: 38245852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of effects of the Dynesys and Coflex dynamic stabilization systems on range of motion and loading characteristics in the lumbar spine: a finite element study.
    Kulduk A; Altun NS; Senkoylu A
    Int J Med Robot; 2015 Dec; 11(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 25643936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro animal study of the biomechanical responses of anulus fibrosus with aging.
    Park C; Kim YJ; Lee CS; An K; Shin HJ; Lee CH; Kim CH; Shin JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):E259-65. PubMed ID: 15897815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in intervertebral disc cross-sectional area with bed rest and space flight.
    LeBlanc AD; Evans HJ; Schneider VS; Wendt RE; Hedrick TD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Apr; 19(7):812-7. PubMed ID: 8202800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo diurnal variation in intervertebral disc volume and morphology.
    Botsford DJ; Esses SI; Ogilvie-Harris DJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Apr; 19(8):935-40. PubMed ID: 8009352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs.
    Galbusera F; Schmidt H; Noailly J; Malandrino A; Lacroix D; Wilke HJ; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 21783132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of human lumbar intervertebral joints. Experimental and finite-element investigations.
    Kasra M; Shirazi-Adl A; Drouin G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 Jan; 17(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 1536019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.