These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10515308)

  • 1. Effects of training dose on the relationship between discriminative-stimulus and self-reported drug effects of d-amphetamine in humans.
    Kollins SH; Rush CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 10515308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discriminative stimulus and self-reported effects of methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and triazolam in methylphenidate-trained humans.
    Stoops WW; Lile JA; Glaser PE; Rush CR
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2005 Feb; 13(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 15727504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Similar discriminative-stimulus effects of D-amphetamine in women and men.
    Vansickel AR; Lile JA; Stoops WW; Rush CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007; 87(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 17561238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. (-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats.
    Bardo MT; Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Crooks PA; Dwoskin LP
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1083-7. PubMed ID: 9408217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influencing the specificity of drug mixture discriminations by varying the training procedure.
    Stolerman IP; Mariathasan EA; White JA
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Nov; 10(6-7):657-64. PubMed ID: 10780507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aripiprazole attenuates the discriminative-stimulus and subject-rated effects of D-amphetamine in humans.
    Lile JA; Stoops WW; Vansickel AR; Glaser PE; Hays LR; Rush CR
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2005 Nov; 30(11):2103-14. PubMed ID: 15988473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine in humans under a cocaine discrimination procedure.
    Oliveto AH; McCance-Katz E; Singha A; Hameedi F; Kosten TR
    Behav Pharmacol; 1998 May; 9(3):207-17. PubMed ID: 9832935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oxazepam does not modulate the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine in humans.
    Lile JA; Stoops WW; Wagner FP; Glaser PE; Rush CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2005 Oct; 82(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16182353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human d-amphetamine drug discrimination: methamphetamine and hydromorphone.
    Lamb RJ; Henningfield JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Mar; 61(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 7513346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 5-HT3 receptor partial agonist MD-354 (meta-chlorophenylguanidine) enhances the discriminative stimulus actions of (+)amphetamine in rats.
    Dukat M; Wesolowska A; Young R; Glennon RA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007; 87(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 17540440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Four-choice drug discrimination in pigeons.
    Li M; McMillan DE
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 12(8):621-8. PubMed ID: 11856899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alprazolam attenuates the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine in humans.
    Rush CR; Stoops WW; Wagner FP; Hays LR; Glaser PE
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2004 Aug; 24(4):410-20. PubMed ID: 15232333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of mu opioid agonists alone and in combination with cocaine and D-amphetamine in rhesus monkeys trained to discriminate cocaine.
    Negus SS; Gatch MB; Mello NK
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 1998 May; 18(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 9536446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and diazepam in humans.
    Heishman SJ; Henningfield JE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 103(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 2062984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opioid discrimination in humans: discriminative and subjective effects of progressively lower training dose.
    Preston KL; Bigelow GE
    Behav Pharmacol; 1998 Nov; 9(7):533-43. PubMed ID: 9862079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing food deprivation relative to baseline influences D-amphetamine dose-response gradients.
    Lotfizadeh AD; Zimmermann ZJ; Watkins EE; Edwards TL; Poling A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2014 Oct; 125():65-69. PubMed ID: 25179163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discriminative stimulus and subject-rated effects of methamphetamine, d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and triazolam in methamphetamine-trained humans.
    Sevak RJ; Stoops WW; Hays LR; Rush CR
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2009 Mar; 328(3):1007-18. PubMed ID: 19104030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discriminative stimulus effects of caffeine and benzphetamine in amphetamine-trained volunteers.
    Chait LD; Johanson CE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 96(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 3146764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminative-stimulus and participant-rated effects of methylphenidate, bupropion, and triazolam in d-amphetamine-trained humans.
    Rush CR; Kollins SH; Pazzaglia PJ
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 1998 Feb; 6(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 9526144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discriminative-stimulus effects of modafinil in cocaine-trained humans.
    Rush CR; Kelly TH; Hays LR; Wooten AF
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2002 Aug; 67(3):311-22. PubMed ID: 12127202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.