201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10515322)
1. Influence of training paradigm on specificity of drug mixture discriminations.
Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP; White JA
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 10515322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influencing the specificity of drug mixture discriminations by varying the training procedure.
Stolerman IP; Mariathasan EA; White JA
Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Nov; 10(6-7):657-64. PubMed ID: 10780507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AND and AND-OR drug mixture discriminations in rats: generalization to single drugs and drug mixtures.
Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP; White JA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Mar; 143(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 10227080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drug mixtures and ethanol as compound internal stimuli.
Stolerman IP; Mariathasan EA; White JA; Olufsen KS
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 10515295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Four-choice drug discrimination in pigeons.
Li M; McMillan DE
Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 12(8):621-8. PubMed ID: 11856899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Drug discrimination studies in rats with caffeine and phenylpropanolamine administered separately and as mixtures.
Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1992; 109(1-2):99-106. PubMed ID: 1365678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional relationships, previous history and the discrimination of a drug mixture in rats.
Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP
Drug Alcohol Depend; 1994 Apr; 35(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 8055733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The discriminative stimulus properties of legal, over-the-counter stimulants administered singly and in binary and ternary combinations.
Gauvin DV; Moore KR; Youngblood BD; Holloway FA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1993; 110(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 7831424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention of sequential drug discriminations under fixed-interval schedules for long time periods without training.
Li M; McMillan DE
Eur J Pharmacol; 2003 Aug; 476(1-2):79-85. PubMed ID: 12969752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The 5-HT3 receptor partial agonist MD-354 (meta-chlorophenylguanidine) enhances the discriminative stimulus actions of (+)amphetamine in rats.
Dukat M; Wesolowska A; Young R; Glennon RA
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007; 87(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 17540440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reinforcement schedule effects in rats trained to discriminate 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or cocaine.
Kueh D; Baker LE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Jan; 189(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 17019568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drug discrimination analysis of midazolam under a three-lever procedure: I. Dose-dependent differences in generalization and antagonism.
Sannerud CA; Ator NA
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1995 Jan; 272(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 7815322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Drug discrimination analysis of pseudoephedrine in rats.
Tongjaroenbuangam W; Meksuriyen D; Govitrapong P; Kotchabhakdi N; Baldwin BA
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Feb; 59(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 9477001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of training dose on discrimination and cross-generalization of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol in the rat.
De Vry J; Slangen JL
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 88(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 3083454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The discriminative stimulus properties of an ethanol-nicotine mixture in rats.
Gauvin DV; Holloway FA
J Psychopharmacol; 1993 Jan; 7(1 Suppl):52-62. PubMed ID: 22290371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generalisation of ethanol with drug mixtures containing a positive modulator of the GABA(A) receptor and an NMDA antagonist.
Stolerman IP; Olufsen K
Neuropharmacology; 2001; 40(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 11077078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiating benzodiazepine- and barbiturate-like discriminative stimulus effects of lorazepam, diazepam, pentobarbital, imidazenil and zaleplon in two- versus three-lever procedures.
Ator NA; Kautz MA
Behav Pharmacol; 2000 Feb; 11(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 10821204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Training dose as a decisive factor for discrimination of a drug mixture in rats.
Mariathasan EA; White JA; Stolerman IP
Behav Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 7(4):364-372. PubMed ID: 11224430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement.
Stolerman IP
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 97(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 2496419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine and pentobarbitone separately and as mixtures in rats.
Mariathasan EA; Garcha HS; Stolerman IP
Behav Pharmacol; 1991 Nov; 2(4 And 5):405-415. PubMed ID: 11224083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
