These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10515322)

  • 21. (-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats.
    Bardo MT; Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Crooks PA; Dwoskin LP
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1083-7. PubMed ID: 9408217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stimulus properties of nicotine, amphetamine, and chlordiazepoxide as positive features in a pavlovian appetitive discrimination task in rats.
    Palmatier MI; Wilkinson JL; Metschke DM; Bevins RA
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2005 Apr; 30(4):731-41. PubMed ID: 15592350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Antagonism of AND and AND-OR drug mixture discriminations in rats.
    Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP; White JA
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1997 Jan; 44(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9031817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Discriminative properties of the psychostimulant dl-cathinone in a two lever operant task. Lack of evidence for dopaminergic mediation.
    Goudie AJ; Atkinson J; West CR
    Neuropharmacology; 1986 Jan; 25(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 2869439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of training history on ethanol discrimination in rats.
    Stolerman IP; Olufsen KS
    Behav Pharmacol; 2000 Nov; 11(7-8):603-12. PubMed ID: 11198131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences between alcohol-preferring and alcohol-nonpreferring rats in ethanol generalization.
    McMillan DE; Li M; Shide DJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 10515323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of drug discrimination history on drug discrimination and on punished and unpunished responding.
    Li M; McMillan DE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Sep; 61(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 9715811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Discrimination of an amphetamine-pentobarbitone mixture by rats in an AND-OR paradigm.
    Stolerman IP; Mariathasan EA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1990; 102(4):557-60. PubMed ID: 2096415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine in humans under a cocaine discrimination procedure.
    Oliveto AH; McCance-Katz E; Singha A; Hameedi F; Kosten TR
    Behav Pharmacol; 1998 May; 9(3):207-17. PubMed ID: 9832935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High-dose discrimination training with midazolam: context determines generalization profile.
    Ator NA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 10515297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Discriminative stimulus properties of psychomotor stimulants in the cat.
    Kilbey MM; Ellinwood EH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1979 May; 63(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 38476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relation between discriminative and reinforcing effects of midazolam, pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, zolpidem, and imidazenil in baboons.
    Ator NA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):477-87. PubMed ID: 12373448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reversal of overshadowing in a drug mixture discrimination in rats.
    White JA; Stolerman IP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1996 Jan; 123(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 8741954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. (+)Amphetamine-stimulus generalization to an herbal ephedrine product.
    Glennon RA; Young R
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2000 Apr; 65(4):655-8. PubMed ID: 10764918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Drug discrimination learning in rats with excitotoxic lesions of nucleus basalis and ventral globus pallidus.
    Marston HM; Garcha HS; Robbins TW; Stolerman IP
    Behav Brain Res; 1992 Oct; 51(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 1482549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of amphetamine-CNS depressant combinations and of other CNS stimulants in four-choice drug discriminations.
    Li M; Wessinger WD; McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):77-97. PubMed ID: 16156138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In a drug discrimination procedure isolation-reared rats generalize to lower doses of cocaine and amphetamine than rats reared in an enriched environment.
    Fowler SC; Johnson JS; Kallman MJ; Liou JR; Wilson MC; Hikal AH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1993; 110(1-2):115-8. PubMed ID: 7870869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The discrimination of drug mixtures using a four-choice procedure in pigeons.
    McMillan DE; Li M
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Nov; 164(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 12404084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pentobarbital discrimination in the mouse.
    Balster RL; Moser VC
    Alcohol Drug Res; 1987; 7(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 3828000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The stimulus properties of two common over-the-counter drug mixtures: dextromethorphan + ephedrine and dextromethorphan + diphenhydramine.
    Gauvin DV; Vanecek SA; Baird TJ; Vallett M; Briscoe RJ; Carl KL; Holloway FA; Sannerud CA
    J Psychopharmacol; 1998; 12(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 9584972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.