These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10515425)

  • 1. A critical evaluation of the Mefar dosimeter.
    Ward RJ; Liakakos P; Leonard RF; Reid DW; Johns DP; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1999 Aug; 14(2):430-4. PubMed ID: 10515425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in nebulizer aerosol output and weight output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
    Chinn S; Arossa WA; Jarvis DL; Luczynska CM; Burney PG
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Feb; 10(2):452-6. PubMed ID: 9042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Community Respiratory Health Survey calibration project of dosimeter driving pressures.
    Ward RJ; Ward C; Johns DP; Skoric B; Abramson M; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 2002 Feb; 19(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 11866005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation in nebulizer output and weight output from Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
    Ward RJ; Reid DW; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Oct; 10(10):2436-7. PubMed ID: 9387980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of aerosol output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for epidemiological studies.
    Dennis JH; Avery AJ; Walters EH; Hendrick DJ
    Eur Respir J; 1992 Nov; 5(10):1279-82. PubMed ID: 1486976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of driving pressure and nebulizer model on aerosol output during intermittent delivery with a dosimeter.
    Alkins SA; Hurwitz KM; Sierra A
    J Aerosol Med; 2002; 15(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12006140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two methacholine challenge methods using Spira-2 or Mefar dosimeter.
    Jõgi R; Janson C; Hedenström H
    Clin Physiol; 1999 Jul; 19(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 10451790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new method for measuring aerosol nebulizer output using radioactive tracers.
    Gatnash AA; Chandler ST; Connolly CK
    Eur Respir J; 1998 Aug; 12(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 9727803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in bronchial responsiveness in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS).
    Chinn S; Burney P; Jarvis D; Luczynska C
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Nov; 10(11):2495-501. PubMed ID: 9426085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A set-up for bronchial provocation by continuously generated aerosols.
    Moldovan D; Gliga M; Simon L; Boga F; Jazigian A
    Rom J Intern Med; 1994; 32(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 7613504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.
    Siersted HC; Walker CM; O'Shaughnessy AD; Willan AR; Wiecek EM; Sears MR
    Eur Respir J; 2000 Jan; 15(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 10678643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The physical and biological doses of methacholine are different for Mefar MB3 and Jaeger APS sidestream nebulizers.
    Praml G; Scharrer E; de la Motte D; Nowak D; Scheuch G; Sommerer K; Radon K
    Chest; 2005 Nov; 128(5):3585-9. PubMed ID: 16304317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple dosimeter for bronchial provocation testing using a solid-state electronic timing module.
    Thomson DB; Clanton TL
    Respir Care; 1986 Dec; 31(12):1204-6. PubMed ID: 10315719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bronchial challenge: a small reservoir for the Wright jet nebulizer.
    Madsen F; Nielsen NH; Frølund L; Svendsen UG; Weeke B
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1987; 23(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 3593997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenging the two-minute tidal breathing challenge test.
    Lexmond AJ; Hagedoorn P; Frijlink HW; de Boer AH
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2013 Dec; 26(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 23509936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Different performance of two commercial nebulizers.
    Arossa W; Quagliotti F; Sala M; Spinaci S; De Candussio G
    Respiration; 1984; 46(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 6494601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.
    Blais CM; Cockcroft DW; Veilleux J; Boulay MÈ; Boulet LP; Gauvreau GM; Scime TX; Watson RM; O'Byrne PM; Davis BE
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2018 Apr; 31(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 28813613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests.
    Cockcroft DW; Hurst TS; Gore BP
    Chest; 1989 Sep; 96(3):505-8. PubMed ID: 2486186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The physical properties of a jet-nebulizer and their relevance for the histamine provocation test.
    Sterk PJ; Plomp A; Crobach MJ; van de Vate JF; Quanjer PH
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1983; 19(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 6850144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro study to investigate the use of a breath-actuated, small-volume, pneumatic nebulizer for the delivery of methacholine chloride bronchoprovocation agent.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Bates SL; Doyle CC
    Respir Care; 2003 Jan; 48(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12556261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.