These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10515425)

  • 21. An Apparatus to Deliver Mannitol Powder for Bronchial Provocation in Children Under Six Years Old.
    Tang P; Leung SS; Hor E; Ruzycki CA; Carrigy NB; Finlay WH; Brannan JD; Devadason S; Anderson SD; Sly PD; Samnick K; Chan HK
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2015 Dec; 28(6):452-61. PubMed ID: 25844950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nebulizer output for methacholine challenges with the KoKo Digidoser.
    Khan YR; McDonough P; Cockcroft DW; David BE; Hendeles L
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Oct; 116(4):924-6. PubMed ID: 16210072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Standardizing dose in dosimetric bronchial challenge tests.
    Malmberg LP; Kauppi P; Mäkelä MJ
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):903-906. PubMed ID: 29345046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methacholine bronchial challenge using a dosimeter with controlled tidal breathing.
    Nieminen MM; Lahdensuo A; Kellomaeki L; Karvonen J; Muittari A
    Thorax; 1988 Nov; 43(11):896-900. PubMed ID: 3065974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of oscillometry as a measure of airway responsiveness in asthmatic children after histamine and methacholine bronchoprovocation with dosimeter-MedicAid and DeVilbiss nebulizers.
    Kopriva F; Szotkowská J; Plocová A; Závodská J; Zápalka M; Smatanová D; Látalová M; Slezáková L; Radová L
    J Asthma; 2007 May; 44(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 17530524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge.
    Hendeles L; Khan YR; Shuster JJ; Spencer T
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Nov; 120(5):1218-9. PubMed ID: 17637473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes of nebulizer output over the years.
    Merkus PJ; van Essen-Zandvliet EE; Parlevliet E; Borsboom G; Sterk PJ; Kerrebijn KF; Quanjer PH
    Eur Respir J; 1992 Apr; 5(4):488-91. PubMed ID: 1563507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measuring nebulizer output. Aerosol production vs gravimetric analysis.
    Tandon R; McPeck M; Smaldone GC
    Chest; 1997 May; 111(5):1361-5. PubMed ID: 9149595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nebulizer calibration using lithium chloride: an accurate, reproducible and user-friendly method.
    Ward RJ; Reid DW; Leonard RF; Johns DP; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1998 Apr; 11(4):937-41. PubMed ID: 9623700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Leung K; Dell SD
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2014 Feb; 27(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23586502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.
    Dell SD; Bola SS; Foty RG; Marshall LC; Nelligan KA; Coates AL
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 25575246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of micronic aerosol generators and their aerosol characteristics.
    Chinet T; Collignon MA; Dusser D; Barritault L; Huchon GJ
    Eur J Respir Dis; 1986 Sep; 69(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 3536549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aerosol Use in the Pulmonary Function Lab.
    Ruppel GL
    Respir Care; 2015 Jun; 60(6):931-40; discussion 940. PubMed ID: 26070584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD
    Davis BE; Simonson SK; Blais CM; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2017 Dec; 152(6):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 28923758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Output of histamine chloride from 7 nebulizers.
    Nortoft E; Bundgaard A
    Eur J Respir Dis Suppl; 1986; 143():8-10. PubMed ID: 3462021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An electromechanical breathing device for minimal particle loss while inhaling aerosols.
    Lindahl OA; Rudell B; Bäcklund T
    J Med Eng Technol; 1993; 17(4):138-40. PubMed ID: 8295223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new aerosol device for bronchial provocation tests.
    Matthys H; Knoch M; Eltschka R
    Respiration; 1993; 60(6):343-50. PubMed ID: 8290799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of the Yan and a dosimeter method for methacholine challenge in experienced and inexperienced subjects.
    Knox AJ; Wisniewski A; Cooper S; Tattersfield AE
    Eur Respir J; 1991 Apr; 4(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 1855579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differences in aerosol output and airways responsiveness between the DeVilbiss 40 and 45 hand held nebulisers.
    Hartley-Sharpe CJ; Booth H; Johns DP; Walters EH
    Thorax; 1995 Jun; 50(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 7638805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Controlled dynamic generation of standard 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate aerosols.
    Huynh CK; Duc TV; Savolainen H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1989; 33(4):573-81. PubMed ID: 2604320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.